Conditional Justice

AuthorDavid M. Paciocco
Pages47-65
CHAPTER
^
Conditional
Justice
A
her
thirty-five years well. Both
life
and
lifestyle
had
been hard
on
her.
On 24
November
1993
life
and
lifestyle proved
to be
even
harder
on her
common-law husband
of
three
years, Vincent
Foley.
That
was
the
evening
that
Lisa
Ferguson shot
him to
death.
Vincent Foley
and
Lisa Ferguson
had
been living together
for
three
years
or so,
along with Lisa's young son. They lived
on a
small hobby
farm
raising
eighteen beef
cattle
in
Woodlawn,
Ontario,
not far
from
Kanata,
the
home
of the
Ottawa Senators. Vincent worked
on and off as an
ele-
vator repairman while
Lisa
tended
to the
farm.
The
setting
may
have been
idyllic,
but
these
people
did not
live
in
bliss. According
to
neighbours,
when
the
countryside became
quiet
at
night near Woodlawn,
it did not
always
become tranquil. Vincent could sometimes
be
heard shouting
and
cursing. Neighbours said
the
relationship
was
abusive
on
both
sides.
According
to
Lisa, though,
the
real abuse,
the
kind
that
shatters bones
and
the
human spirit,
was
one-sided.
She
claimed
that
Vincent,
a man who at
least
one
neighbour said
he had
seen sober only once, abused
her
physi-
cally,
sexually,
and
psychologically.
She had
left
him on at
least
three
occa-
sions because
of his
abuse,
but
always returned
after
he
promised
to
stop
hurting her.
When Lisa Ferguson
was
abused
by
Vincent Foley
on 24
November
1993,
she
decided
not to
leave. Instead,
she
killed him.
The
tragedy
of
that
evening,
an
event
that
would cause
Lisa
to
attempt
to end her own
life
three
times, started when
she had
complained
to
Vincent about
how
unrea-
sonable
he was
being, expecting
her to do the
chores
and to get his
supper.
He
responded
by
striking
her a
number
of
times
and
grabbing
her by the
side
of the
face
and
throwing
her
down
a
flight
of
stairs.
After
she had
lain
at the
bottom
of the
stairs
for a
while regaining
her
breath,
she
retrieved
a
rifle,
loaded
it, and
went
looking
for
him.
He was not in his
room.
She
went
downstairs into
the
kitchen.
He was not
there.
She saw him in the
living
A t the time of her court appearances, Lisa Ferguson did not wear
48
CRIME
AND
PUNISHMENT
room lying
on the
couch,
the final
resting
place,
it
seems,
of a
number
of
abusive,
alcoholic men. There
she
shot him,
first
once,
and
then again.
At
the
trial
she
testified
that
he was
coming towards
her at the time.
When
she
had
called
for the
ambulance, though,
she
provided
a
different story.
She
can
be
heard
on the
911
tape
that
was
played
to the
jury
saying,
"He's beat
on
me so
many times. He's passed
out
cold
and I
shot him."
At her
trial,
her
soft-spoken, highly experienced attorney, Leonard
Shore,
presented evidence
to
establish
that
Lisa
Ferguson
suffered
from
"battered woman syndrome." Given
the
quality
of her
counsel,
it
would
have
been
an
effective
presentation.
Dr.
Fredrick Shane,
the
best-known
expert
in the
field
in
Canada,
was
called
on her
behalf. According
to the
theory
of
battered woman
syndrome,
women
suffering
from
it can
predict,
through experience,
the
onset
of
violence,
but
they lose
the
ability
to
escape
from
it.
They become trapped
in a
cycle
of
abuse
that
robs
them
of
their self-esteem
and
self-control.
The
fear
builds,
and in
some cases they
come
to
believe they have
no way
out. There
is no
point
in
going
to the
police.
There
is no
point
in
running
away.
They come
to
believe,
the
theory
goes,
that they must kill
to
save themselves. This perspective
is not one
they
acquire
through their
own
fault.
It is the
product
of an
escalating pattern
of
abuse
which ultimately robs them
of
their powers
of
self-determination.
Violence
no
longer remains
a
matter
of
choice;
it
becomes
a
matter
of
sur-
vival.
This
was
what
Dr.
Shane said happened
to
Lisa
Ferguson.1
Had
he
been right,
she
would
not
have been guilty
of
anything.
The
Supreme Court
of
Canada modified
the
defence
of
self-defence
in
1990
to
make
it
available
to
women
suffering
from
the
syndrome who, while
reasonably
fearing
death
or
great bodily harm, form
the
reasonable belief
that
they have
no
choice
but to
kill.2
The
defence
is
remarkable because
it
allows women
to use
fatal
force,
even though
the
threat
they
are
defending
against
is not
immediate. Battered woman syndrome theory
purports
to
explain
how it is
reasonable
for
women
to
believe
that
they
cannot protect themselves simply
by
leaving
or
summoning
the
assistance
of
the
police
or
asking
for the
help
of
others.
The
abuse robs them
of
con-
trol, rendering them helpless
to the
point where self-defence becomes
their only option.
A
conceptual problem arises
in
applying
the
theory
of
battered
woman syndrome.
It has
aptly been pointed
out
that
"it is
hardly
a
sign
of
helplessness
to
acquire
a gun and to
kill one's psychological
captor."3
Whether
it was
scepticism about
the
battered woman syndrome theory,
the
divergence between Ferguson's testimony
and the
911
statement,
or a
simple
refusal
to
accept
the
law's opinion
that
abused women
are
justified
in
killing their abusers based
on
fear
of
future attack,
the
jury
did not buy

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT