The Injustice of Parole

AuthorDavid M. Paciocco
Pages67-92
CHAPTER
4
The
Injustice
of
Parole
Anyone
knowing
the
whereabouts
of
Nicole Marguerite
Mattison
is
asked
to
contact
the
Metropolitan Toronto Police. Mrs. Mattison
has
been missing since
2
December
1992
when
she was
last seen walking
east
on the
south side
of
King
Street West
at
Spadina Avenue.
She is
fifty-three
years
of
age,
five
foot
10
inches tall,
and
weighs
150
pounds.
She has
blond hair
and was
wearing
a
multi-coloured jacket,
maroon slacks
and
black shoes
at the
time
of her
disappearance.
She
was
also
wearing
two
gold
chains,
one
with
a
pendant with
the
inscription "Live,
Love,
Laugh."
"Live,
Love, Laugh," thought Constable McGreal when
he
received
the
missing
person's report
from
Nicole's husband, David,
a
month before
the
press conference. "There hasn't been much loving
and
laughing
in
that
marriage."
He had
worked with David Mattison
at the
downtown
52
Division, where Mattison
was a
police sergeant.
He
recalled
how
David
would come
to his
place with
his
girlfriend
while Nicole
sat at
home.
McGreal could never understand
it.
David,
an
astute
investor, probably
had
more than
a
million dollars, maybe
a
couple
of
million. "Why don't
you
just split things down
the
middle
and let her go her way and you go
yours?"
he
would say.
But
they stayed together.
It
wasn't because David
loved
her.
In
January
1991
he
told
a
marriage counsellor
that
he
would
rather
do
five
years
for
killing
her
than
fifteen
years living with her.
"Perhaps
they stay together because Nicole
won't
let
go,"
he
thought.
"Why else
was she
always
phoning around looking
for
him?"
Maybe
they felt they
had to
stay together
for the
sake
of
their
two
grandchildren. Nicole
and
David
had
lost
their
eldest
son, Lionel,
in a car
accident
in
northern Ontario three years
before
and
they
had
custody
of
P
ress Release, 22 January 199:
68
CRIME
AND
PUNISHMENT
his
two
children. While
that
tragedy
may
have kept them
together,
it did
not
make them
any
closer.
It
simply increased
the
stress
and
tension.
Things
got so bad
that
David ultimately took
his
girlfriend
to
Florida
and
boasted
to
Nicole about
it.
Indeed,
he had
probably done
so
again
only
a
few
weeks before Nicole went missing;
he had
gone
to
Florida without
her
at the
same time
that
his
girlfriend
had
taken
her
vacation. This
was
not a
happy marriage.
Constable McGreal couldn't help
feeling
nervous about
the
missing
person's
report.
It
made
no
sense.
Why had
David waited nineteen days
before
reporting Nicole missing? When
he did
file
the
report
it
just
felt
wrong.
He had told McGreal that on 2 December he and Nicole had an
argument
while
in the
car.
She got out at the
busy intersection, slammed
the
door,
and
punched
the
passenger window, shattering
it,
before walk-
ing
away.
It was not the
account
of
Nicole punching
the
window
that
caused
McGreal
to
doubt
the
story. Nicole worked
as a
jail guard
and was a
stocky
5
feet
10
inches.
She was
feisty,
too.
On at
least
one
earlier occa-
sion
she had
used
a
knife
to
threaten
David,
who is as
large
as any Tim
Horton's
cop.
But
this report didn't seem right.
As
McGreal
was
later
to
explain:
The
whole thing didn't make sense.
If I
hated
my
wife
and was
reporting
her
missing,
I'd be
sitting down with
a
beer.
I'd say
good rid-
dance.
But he was
very uptight.
Ask a
simple question like "What
colour's
her
eyes?"
and
there'd
be a
long story about
it
before he'd
finally
explain what colour
her
eyes
were.1
Why
would
she
just walk away
from
the
money?
If she
wanted
out she
would
sue
him,
not
disappear.
From
the
start,
foul
play
was
suspected,
and
fifty-eight-year-old
David
Mattison,
who had
brought Nicole back
from
France
in
1961
after
being
posted there with
the
armed
forces,
was the
only suspect. Even
if
the
police
in
Brentwood, California, O.J. Simpson's territory, don't sus-
pect
the
husband when
a
wife dies
or
goes missing,
police
everywhere
else
on the
planet
do.2
The
ironic thing
was
that Nicole
was not
really missing
at
least
not
entirely.
The
police
in
Hamilton, Ontario,
had her
leg; they just
didn't
know
it was
hers.
The
leg, which
had
clearly been severed intentionally,
had
been found washed
up on the
beach
a few
weeks before. Tissue sam-
ples
from
the leg
were being sent
off
to the
United States
for DNA
analy-
sis,
along
with samples taken
from
Nicole's relatives. Even though
the
police responded
at the
press conference
that
the
disappearance
of
Nicole

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT