O'Connor v. O'Connor, (1999) 75 O.T.C. 296 (GD)
| Judge | Perkins, J. |
| Court | Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada) |
| Case Date | October 26, 1998 |
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Citations | (1999), 75 O.T.C. 296 (GD) |
O'Connor v. O'Connor (1999), 75 O.T.C. 296 (GD)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [1999] O.T.C. TBEd. FE.122
Rosein Bernadette O'Connor (applicant) v. Richard Dennis O'Connor (respondent)
(1206-98)
Camille Joanne O'Connor (applicant) v. Richard Dennis O'Connor (respondent)
(285-96)
Carol Anne Dunphy (applicant) v. Richard Dennis O'Connor (respondent)
(110-98)
Indexed As: O'Connor v. O'Connor
Ontario Court of Justice
General Division
Family Court Branch
Barrie
Perkins, J.
February 9, 1999.
Summary:
A father had four children with three different mothers. The mothers claimed child support in accordance with the Federal Child Support Guidelines. The father argued, inter alia, that requiring him to pay the Guideline amount for so many children created an undue hardship.
The Ontario Court (General Division), Family Court Branch, determined maintenance in accordance with the Guidelines and rejected the father's argument respecting undue hardship.
Family Law - Topic 4045.6
Divorce - Corollary relief - Maintenance - Support guidelines - Exceptions and exemptions (incl. undue hardship) - See paragraphs 29 to 34.
Cases Noticed:
Bevand v. Bevand and Stein, [1997] O.J. No. 2661 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 25].
Statutes Noticed:
Divorce Act Regulations (Can.), Federal Child Support Guidelines, SOR/97-175, sect. 10 [para. 29].
Federal Child Support Guidelines - see Divorce Act Regulations (Can.).
Counsel:
None of the applicants were represented or present;
The respondent appeared in person.
This application was heard on October 26, 1998, before Perkins, J., of the Ontario Court (General Division), Family Court Branch, who delivered the following decision on February 9, 1999.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Table of Cases
...191, 192 O’Connor v O’Connor, [1999] OJ No 362, 75 OTC 296 (Gen Div)........................................................96, 383, 530 O’Dacre v Cross, 2019 ONSC 2265.................................................................................................................................
-
Table of cases
...1311, 8 RFL (5th) 326 (SC) .......................................................................48 O’Connor v O’Connor, [1999] OJ No 362, 75 OTC 296 (Gen Div) ......................................................93, 366, 499 O’Dacre v Cross, 2019 ONSC 2265 .....................................
-
Table of cases
...B.C.J. No. 1311, 8 R.F.L. (5th) 326 (S.C.)...................................... 41, 54, 114 O’Connor v. O’Connor, [1999] O.J. No. 362, 75 O.T.C. 296 (Gen. Div.) 75 O.T.C. 296 (Gen. Div.) (Gen. Div.) .................83, 87–88, 319, 442–43 O’Dare v. Paley, [1997] B.C.J. No. 1004 (S.C.) ..........
-
Table of cases
...41, 55, 115 O’Connor v. O’Connor, [1999] O.J. No. 362, 75 O.T.C. 296 (Gen. Div.) ............................................................................... 100, 105, 347, 480 O’Dare v. Paley, [1997] B.C.J. No. 1004 (S.C.) ......................................................................
-
D.L. v. M.L. et al.,
...Exceptions et exemptions (notamment difficultés excessives) - [Voir Family Law - Topic 4045.6 ]. Cases Noticed: O'Connor v. O'Connor (1999), 75 O.T.C. 296 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 3, footnote K.F. v. T.B. (2012), 388 N.B.R.(2d) 215; 1006 A.P.R. 215; 2012 NBQB 144, refd to. [para. 27]. Y......
-
Table of Cases
...191, 192 O’Connor v O’Connor, [1999] OJ No 362, 75 OTC 296 (Gen Div)........................................................96, 383, 530 O’Dacre v Cross, 2019 ONSC 2265.................................................................................................................................
-
Table of cases
...1311, 8 RFL (5th) 326 (SC) .......................................................................48 O’Connor v O’Connor, [1999] OJ No 362, 75 OTC 296 (Gen Div) ......................................................93, 366, 499 O’Dacre v Cross, 2019 ONSC 2265 .....................................
-
Table of cases
...B.C.J. No. 1311, 8 R.F.L. (5th) 326 (S.C.)...................................... 41, 54, 114 O’Connor v. O’Connor, [1999] O.J. No. 362, 75 O.T.C. 296 (Gen. Div.) 75 O.T.C. 296 (Gen. Div.) (Gen. Div.) .................83, 87–88, 319, 442–43 O’Dare v. Paley, [1997] B.C.J. No. 1004 (S.C.) ..........
-
Table of cases
...41, 55, 115 O’Connor v. O’Connor, [1999] O.J. No. 362, 75 O.T.C. 296 (Gen. Div.) ............................................................................... 100, 105, 347, 480 O’Dare v. Paley, [1997] B.C.J. No. 1004 (S.C.) ......................................................................