Continental Steel Ltd. v. CTL Steel Ltd. et al., 2014 BCSC 104

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeKent, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterPRACTICE
Citation2014 BCSC 104,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 104 (SC),[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 104
Date10 January 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • British Columbia v. Apotex Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 4, 2022
    ...2015 BCSC 1372 at para. 40 [Violette]. [48]        In Continental Steel Ltd. v. CTL Steel Ltd., 2014 BCSC 104, Justice Kent helpfully summarized the principles that govern the granting of leave to amend pleadings as follows: [26]      &......
  • Fengyun v. He, 2017 BCSC 110
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 10, 2017
    ...it is not in the interests of justice was more recently referred to by Mr. Justice Kent in Continental Steel Ltd. v. CTL Steel Ltd., 2014 BCSC 104: [26] Some of the basic principles governing applications for leave to amend pleadings 1. The court has a wide discretion to permit amendments s......
  • Mand v. Cheema,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 22, 2021
    ...governing applications for leave to amend pleadings have been summarized in Continental Steel Ltd. v. CTL Steel Ltd., 2014 BCSC 104 at para. 26 and in British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Violette, 2015 BCSC 1372 at para. 41 [citations 1. The cour......
  • Finch v. Anderson et al., 2014 BCSC 2008
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 27, 2014
    ...[20] The applicable test was not disputed. It was recently set out by Mr. Justice Kent in Continental Steel Ltd. v. CTL Steel Ltd., 2014 BCSC 104, as follows: [27] With respect to applications under Rule 7-7(5)(c), the leave to withdraw an admission made in a pleading, the principles to be ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • British Columbia v. Apotex Inc., 2022 BCSC 1
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 4, 2022
    ...2015 BCSC 1372 at para. 40 [Violette]. [48]        In Continental Steel Ltd. v. CTL Steel Ltd., 2014 BCSC 104, Justice Kent helpfully summarized the principles that govern the granting of leave to amend pleadings as follows: [26]      &......
  • Fengyun v. He, 2017 BCSC 110
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 10, 2017
    ...it is not in the interests of justice was more recently referred to by Mr. Justice Kent in Continental Steel Ltd. v. CTL Steel Ltd., 2014 BCSC 104: [26] Some of the basic principles governing applications for leave to amend pleadings 1. The court has a wide discretion to permit amendments s......
  • Tekamar Mortgage Fund Ltd. v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2021 BCSC 1355
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 4, 2021
    ...and meaningful prejudice to the opposing party that cannot otherwise be dealt with in costs. Continental Steel Ltd. v. CTL Steel Ltd., 2014 BCSC 104. Analysis [9]           The subject matter of the application is causation, which I understa......
  • Mand v. Cheema, 2021 BCSC 1854
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 22, 2021
    ...governing applications for leave to amend pleadings have been summarized in Continental Steel Ltd. v. CTL Steel Ltd., 2014 BCSC 104 at para. 26 and in British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Violette, 2015 BCSC 1372 at para. 41 [citations 1. The cour......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT