Cornell v. Tuck, 2018 ONSC 7085
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Coats |
| Citation | 2018 ONSC 7085 |
| Docket Number | 433/09 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Date | 27 November 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Fazal v. ABC Corporation, et al.,
...by the Court, counsel's lack of display of any sense of urgency undercuts the claim of actual prejudice. Reference: Cornell v. Tuck, 2018 ONSC 7085, at paras 77(c) 68. If this Court was to view or presume some prejudice arising from the subject part the Plaintiffs ask that the above li......
-
Grillo Barristers P.C. v. Kagan Law Firm P.C.,
...on the defendants to complain of the delay, to warn of the impending dismissal, or to move the action to trial. [57] In Cornell v. Tuck, 2018 ONSC 7085, at paras. 75 to 77, the court discussed how a Master or reviewing court should consider the defendant’s conduct on a reinstatement [75] Th......
-
Kamalie v. Khari,
...CIBC World Markets, 2013 ONSC 7685 (Div. Ct.); Scaini v. Prochnicki, 2007 ONCA 63 at paras. 21-28; Prescott at para. 15; Cornell v. Tuck, 2018 ONSC 7085 at paras. 32-38). The Court of Appeal provided further guidance in Habib v. Mucaj, 2012 ONCA “[5] There are four well establi......
-
CWH Distribution Services Inc. v. Imperial Chilled Juice Inc.,
...have countenanced even longer delays of up to six (6) years or more in the course of setting aside dismissal orders: Cornell v. Tuck, 2018 ONSC 7085 at paras 79 and 127 [delay of between 5 ½ and 6 years and 1 month]; Chiarelli v. Weins, 2000 CanLII 3904 (ON CA) at paras 17 and 19 [delay of ......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
Fazal v. ABC Corporation, et al.,
...by the Court, counsel's lack of display of any sense of urgency undercuts the claim of actual prejudice. Reference: Cornell v. Tuck, 2018 ONSC 7085, at paras 77(c) 68. If this Court was to view or presume some prejudice arising from the subject part the Plaintiffs ask that the above li......
-
Grillo Barristers P.C. v. Kagan Law Firm P.C.,
...on the defendants to complain of the delay, to warn of the impending dismissal, or to move the action to trial. [57] In Cornell v. Tuck, 2018 ONSC 7085, at paras. 75 to 77, the court discussed how a Master or reviewing court should consider the defendant’s conduct on a reinstatement [75] Th......
-
Kamalie v. Khari,
...CIBC World Markets, 2013 ONSC 7685 (Div. Ct.); Scaini v. Prochnicki, 2007 ONCA 63 at paras. 21-28; Prescott at para. 15; Cornell v. Tuck, 2018 ONSC 7085 at paras. 32-38). The Court of Appeal provided further guidance in Habib v. Mucaj, 2012 ONCA “[5] There are four well establi......
-
CWH Distribution Services Inc. v. Imperial Chilled Juice Inc.,
...have countenanced even longer delays of up to six (6) years or more in the course of setting aside dismissal orders: Cornell v. Tuck, 2018 ONSC 7085 at paras 79 and 127 [delay of between 5 ½ and 6 years and 1 month]; Chiarelli v. Weins, 2000 CanLII 3904 (ON CA) at paras 17 and 19 [delay of ......
Request a trial to view additional results