Cornell v. Tuck
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Judge | Coats |
| Citation | 2018 ONSC 7085 |
| Date | 27 November 2018 |
| Docket Number | 433/09 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 practice notes
-
Grillo Barristers P.C. v. Kagan Law Firm P.C.
...on the defendants to complain of the delay, to warn of the impending dismissal, or to move the action to trial. [57] In Cornell v. Tuck, 2018 ONSC 7085, at paras. 75 to 77, the court discussed how a Master or reviewing court should consider the defendant’s conduct on a reinstatement [75] Th......
-
Fazal v. ABC Corporation, et al.
...by the Court, counsel's lack of display of any sense of urgency undercuts the claim of actual prejudice. Reference: Cornell v. Tuck, 2018 ONSC 7085, at paras 77(c) 68. If this Court was to view or presume some prejudice arising from the subject part the Plaintiffs ask that the above line of......
-
CWH Distribution Services Inc. v. Imperial Chilled Juice Inc.
...have countenanced even longer delays of up to six (6) years or more in the course of setting aside dismissal orders: Cornell v. Tuck, 2018 ONSC 7085 at paras 79 and 127 [delay of between 5 ½ and 6 years and 1 month]; Chiarelli v. Weins, 2000 CanLII 3904 (ON CA) at paras 17 and 19 [delay of ......
-
Kamalie v. Khari
...CIBC World Markets, 2013 ONSC 7685 (Div. Ct.); Scaini v. Prochnicki, 2007 ONCA 63 at paras. 21-28; Prescott at para. 15; Cornell v. Tuck, 2018 ONSC 7085 at paras. 32-38). The Court of Appeal provided further guidance in Habib v. Mucaj, 2012 ONCA “[5] There are four well established factors ......
Get Started for Free
8 cases
-
Grillo Barristers P.C. v. Kagan Law Firm P.C.
...on the defendants to complain of the delay, to warn of the impending dismissal, or to move the action to trial. [57] In Cornell v. Tuck, 2018 ONSC 7085, at paras. 75 to 77, the court discussed how a Master or reviewing court should consider the defendant’s conduct on a reinstatement [75] Th......
-
Fazal v. ABC Corporation, et al.
...by the Court, counsel's lack of display of any sense of urgency undercuts the claim of actual prejudice. Reference: Cornell v. Tuck, 2018 ONSC 7085, at paras 77(c) 68. If this Court was to view or presume some prejudice arising from the subject part the Plaintiffs ask that the above line of......
-
CWH Distribution Services Inc. v. Imperial Chilled Juice Inc.
...have countenanced even longer delays of up to six (6) years or more in the course of setting aside dismissal orders: Cornell v. Tuck, 2018 ONSC 7085 at paras 79 and 127 [delay of between 5 ½ and 6 years and 1 month]; Chiarelli v. Weins, 2000 CanLII 3904 (ON CA) at paras 17 and 19 [delay of ......
-
Kamalie v. Khari
...CIBC World Markets, 2013 ONSC 7685 (Div. Ct.); Scaini v. Prochnicki, 2007 ONCA 63 at paras. 21-28; Prescott at para. 15; Cornell v. Tuck, 2018 ONSC 7085 at paras. 32-38). The Court of Appeal provided further guidance in Habib v. Mucaj, 2012 ONCA “[5] There are four well established factors ......
Get Started for Free
