Cortez v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 800
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Diner, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,PRACTICE,FAMILY LAW |
| Citation | 2016 FC 800 |
| Date | 13 July 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Kusi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 68
...evidence, I too should not engage in a microscopic analysis of the IAD’s reasons: Cortez v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 800 at para 43. As the Supreme Court stated, flaws that are merely superficial, peripheral or amount to a “minor misstep” do not rend......
-
Gill v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 1158
...reasonableness. See Uddin v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 314 at para 19; Cortez v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 800 at para [28] When reviewing a decision on the standard of reasonableness, the analysis will be concerned with “the existence of justification,......
-
Villanueva v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1634
...effect of the misrepresentation on the admissibility of the individuals involved” (Cortez v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 800 at para 41), and more recently, “[t]he case law establishes that the seriousness of the misrepresentation and whether it had any b......
-
Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Wu, 2019 FC 1491
...whether special relief under paragraph 67(1)(c) of the IRPA is warranted is reasonableness: Cortez v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 800 at para 17. [15] The reasonableness of a decision is determined by examining whether the decision-making process was justifiable, inte......
4 cases
-
Kusi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 68
...evidence, I too should not engage in a microscopic analysis of the IAD’s reasons: Cortez v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 800 at para 43. As the Supreme Court stated, flaws that are merely superficial, peripheral or amount to a “minor misstep” do not rend......
-
Gill v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 1158
...reasonableness. See Uddin v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 314 at para 19; Cortez v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 800 at para [28] When reviewing a decision on the standard of reasonableness, the analysis will be concerned with “the existence of justification,......
-
Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Wu, 2019 FC 1491
...whether special relief under paragraph 67(1)(c) of the IRPA is warranted is reasonableness: Cortez v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 800 at para 17. [15] The reasonableness of a decision is determined by examining whether the decision-making process was justifiable, inte......
-
Villanueva v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1634
...effect of the misrepresentation on the admissibility of the individuals involved” (Cortez v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 800 at para 41), and more recently, “[t]he case law establishes that the seriousness of the misrepresentation and whether it had any b......