Coulombe v. Morris
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Jackson |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 BCSC 2034 |
| Citation | 2021 BCSC 2034 |
| Date | 18 October 2021 |
| Docket Number | M1810145 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
Thind v. Mole
...Non-pecuniary damages [24] As I observed in Coulombe v. Morris, 2021 BCSC 2034: [40] The purpose of non-pecuniary damages is to compensate a plaintiff for pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and loss of amenities:&nbs......
-
Grabovac v. Fazio
...must be evidence of medical justification for expenses intended to promote the plaintiff’s physical or mental health: Coulombe v. Morris, 2021 BCSC 2034 at para. 70; Healey v. Mault, 2021 BCSC 2197 at para. 207; Redl v. Sellin, 2013 BCSC 581 at para. 55. [372] I heard very few details about......
-
Einboden v. Porter
...must be evidence of medical justification for expenses intended to promote the plaintiff’s physical or mental health: Coulombe v. Morris, 2021 BCSC 2034 at para. 70; Healey v. Mault, 2021 BCSC 2197 at para. 207; Redl v. Sellin, 2013 BCSC 581 at para. [136] The plaintiff has produced a serie......
-
Ranseth v Doe
...defendant submits that an award in the range of $85,000–$95,000 is instead appropriate, citing the following cases: • Coulombe v. Morris, 2021 BCSC 2034, in which a 2017 motor vehicle accident caused the 36-year-old plaintiff temporary aggravations of pre-existing symptomatic neck, shoulder......
4 cases
-
Thind v. Mole
...Non-pecuniary damages [24] As I observed in Coulombe v. Morris, 2021 BCSC 2034: [40] The purpose of non-pecuniary damages is to compensate a plaintiff for pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and loss of amenities:&nbs......
-
Grabovac v. Fazio
...must be evidence of medical justification for expenses intended to promote the plaintiff’s physical or mental health: Coulombe v. Morris, 2021 BCSC 2034 at para. 70; Healey v. Mault, 2021 BCSC 2197 at para. 207; Redl v. Sellin, 2013 BCSC 581 at para. 55. [372] I heard very few details about......
-
Einboden v. Porter
...must be evidence of medical justification for expenses intended to promote the plaintiff’s physical or mental health: Coulombe v. Morris, 2021 BCSC 2034 at para. 70; Healey v. Mault, 2021 BCSC 2197 at para. 207; Redl v. Sellin, 2013 BCSC 581 at para. [136] The plaintiff has produced a serie......
-
Ranseth v Doe
...defendant submits that an award in the range of $85,000–$95,000 is instead appropriate, citing the following cases: • Coulombe v. Morris, 2021 BCSC 2034, in which a 2017 motor vehicle accident caused the 36-year-old plaintiff temporary aggravations of pre-existing symptomatic neck, shoulder......
