Cowichan Tribes v. Canada (Attorney General)
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Young |
| Citation | 2022 BCSC 1586 |
| Date | 08 September 2022 |
| Docket Number | 14-1027 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
Spera (Lynn Creek) Holdings Ltd v North Vancouver (District)
...abuse of process did not arise on the facts of that case. 57 The District also relies on Cowichan Tribes v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 BCSC 1586. At para. 65. Justice Young found that Dhillon was still good law. In the alternative, at paras. 68–69, Young J. adopted the contextual analy......
-
Anderson v HM the King in the Right of Alberta
...Nation's control – because the Nation has the right to access that recording at any time: Cowichan Tribes v Canada (Attorney General), 2022 BCSC 1586 at paras 109, 123 [ 14 Ultimately, if something classed as a record is relevant and material and is in the party's control, then the party mu......
2 cases
-
Spera (Lynn Creek) Holdings Ltd v North Vancouver (District)
...abuse of process did not arise on the facts of that case. 57 The District also relies on Cowichan Tribes v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 BCSC 1586. At para. 65. Justice Young found that Dhillon was still good law. In the alternative, at paras. 68–69, Young J. adopted the contextual analy......
-
Anderson v HM the King in the Right of Alberta
...Nation's control – because the Nation has the right to access that recording at any time: Cowichan Tribes v Canada (Attorney General), 2022 BCSC 1586 at paras 109, 123 [ 14 Ultimately, if something classed as a record is relevant and material and is in the party's control, then the party mu......
