Cox v. Acapulco, 2020 BCSC 1135
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice Walker |
| Citation | 2020 BCSC 1135 |
| Date | 05 August 2020 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | M174302 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Barn v. Bird,
...at paras. 143–150; Hoy v. Williams, 2014 BCSC 234 at paras. 153–159; Mackie v. Gruber, 2010 BCCA 464 at paras. 18–19; Cox v. Acapulco, 2020 BCSC 1135 at para. 159; Wong v. Campbell, 2020 BCSC 243 at paras. 170–175. [117] Mr. Bird and ICBC agreed with Mr. Barn that the award should be assess......
-
McAuley v. Goodrich,
...involved an award of $75,000 for non-pecuniary damages: Dueck v. Lee, 2019 BCSC 1936; Anderson v. Gagnon, 2018 BCSC 98; Cox v. Acapulco, 2020 BCSC 1135; and McGahan v. Selock, 2020 BCSC [82] I do not agree with the range of damages proposed by either part......
-
Madill v. Gill,
...applicable legal principles concerning damages for the cost of future care were usefully summarized by Justice Walker in Cox v. Acapulco, 2020 BCSC 1135 at [171] The standard of proof is “substantial risk” of pecuniary loss: Milna v. Bartsch, (1985) 49 B.C.L.......
-
2023 BCSC 177,
...on other grounds 2014 BCCA 48; Pololos v. Cinnamon-Lopez, 2016 BCSC 81; and Stapley. 71 The defendant relies on Cox v. Acapulco, 2020 BCSC 1135; Hoffman v. Luan, 2021 BCSC 811; and Barn v. Bird, 2021 BCSC 72 I have considered each of these decisions carefully. While no two cases are identic......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
Barn v. Bird,
...at paras. 143–150; Hoy v. Williams, 2014 BCSC 234 at paras. 153–159; Mackie v. Gruber, 2010 BCCA 464 at paras. 18–19; Cox v. Acapulco, 2020 BCSC 1135 at para. 159; Wong v. Campbell, 2020 BCSC 243 at paras. 170–175. [117] Mr. Bird and ICBC agreed with Mr. Barn that the award should be assess......
-
McAuley v. Goodrich,
...involved an award of $75,000 for non-pecuniary damages: Dueck v. Lee, 2019 BCSC 1936; Anderson v. Gagnon, 2018 BCSC 98; Cox v. Acapulco, 2020 BCSC 1135; and McGahan v. Selock, 2020 BCSC [82] I do not agree with the range of damages proposed by either part......
-
Madill v. Gill,
...applicable legal principles concerning damages for the cost of future care were usefully summarized by Justice Walker in Cox v. Acapulco, 2020 BCSC 1135 at [171] The standard of proof is “substantial risk” of pecuniary loss: Milna v. Bartsch, (1985) 49 B.C.L.......
-
2023 BCSC 177,
...on other grounds 2014 BCCA 48; Pololos v. Cinnamon-Lopez, 2016 BCSC 81; and Stapley. 71 The defendant relies on Cox v. Acapulco, 2020 BCSC 1135; Hoffman v. Luan, 2021 BCSC 811; and Barn v. Bird, 2021 BCSC 72 I have considered each of these decisions carefully. While no two cases are identic......
Request a trial to view additional results