Cox v. Acapulco
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice Walker |
| Citation | 2020 BCSC 1135 |
| Docket Number | M174302 |
| Date | 05 August 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
Barn v. Bird
...at paras. 143–150; Hoy v. Williams, 2014 BCSC 234 at paras. 153–159; Mackie v. Gruber, 2010 BCCA 464 at paras. 18–19; Cox v. Acapulco, 2020 BCSC 1135 at para. 159; Wong v. Campbell, 2020 BCSC 243 at paras. 170–175. [117] Mr. Bird and ICBC agreed with Mr. Barn that the award should be assess......
-
McAuley v. Goodrich
...involved an award of $75,000 for non-pecuniary damages: Dueck v. Lee, 2019 BCSC 1936; Anderson v. Gagnon, 2018 BCSC 98; Cox v. Acapulco, 2020 BCSC 1135; and McGahan v. Selock, 2020 BCSC [82] I do not agree with the range of damages proposed by either party. In the cases cited by the plainti......
-
Madill v. Gill
...applicable legal principles concerning damages for the cost of future care were usefully summarized by Justice Walker in Cox v. Acapulco, 2020 BCSC 1135 at para. [171] The standard of proof is “substantial risk” of pecuniary loss: Milna v. Bartsch, (1985) 49 B.C.L.R. (2d) 33, 1985 (S.C.) at......
-
Binning v. Kandola
...2019 BCSC 1043 ($90,000 or $90,868, adjusted for inflation); ii. Dhugga v. Poirier, 2020 BCSC 914 ($65,000); iii. Cox v. Acapulco, 2020 BCSC 1135 ($75,000); iv. Lawson v. Xu Xing Enterprises Inc., 2020 BCSC 1156 ($55,000). Analysis and Conclusion [81] While these decisions assist in establi......
Get Started for Free
7 cases
-
Barn v. Bird
...at paras. 143–150; Hoy v. Williams, 2014 BCSC 234 at paras. 153–159; Mackie v. Gruber, 2010 BCCA 464 at paras. 18–19; Cox v. Acapulco, 2020 BCSC 1135 at para. 159; Wong v. Campbell, 2020 BCSC 243 at paras. 170–175. [117] Mr. Bird and ICBC agreed with Mr. Barn that the award should be assess......
-
McAuley v. Goodrich
...involved an award of $75,000 for non-pecuniary damages: Dueck v. Lee, 2019 BCSC 1936; Anderson v. Gagnon, 2018 BCSC 98; Cox v. Acapulco, 2020 BCSC 1135; and McGahan v. Selock, 2020 BCSC [82] I do not agree with the range of damages proposed by either party. In the cases cited by the plainti......
-
Madill v. Gill
...applicable legal principles concerning damages for the cost of future care were usefully summarized by Justice Walker in Cox v. Acapulco, 2020 BCSC 1135 at para. [171] The standard of proof is “substantial risk” of pecuniary loss: Milna v. Bartsch, (1985) 49 B.C.L.R. (2d) 33, 1985 (S.C.) at......
-
Binning v. Kandola
...2019 BCSC 1043 ($90,000 or $90,868, adjusted for inflation); ii. Dhugga v. Poirier, 2020 BCSC 914 ($65,000); iii. Cox v. Acapulco, 2020 BCSC 1135 ($75,000); iv. Lawson v. Xu Xing Enterprises Inc., 2020 BCSC 1156 ($55,000). Analysis and Conclusion [81] While these decisions assist in establi......
Get Started for Free
