CR v PS,

JudgeGraesser
Date13 June 2022
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Docket NumberFL03 65671
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Lemay v Lemay,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 24, 2023
    ...Carolina or in Calgary with the father, not whether shared parenting in Calgary was in the best interests of the parties. In CR v PS, 2022 ABQB 410, at para 64, Justice Graesser interpreted Justice Harris' decision as finding that it is unnecessary to conduct a preliminary parenting as......
  • Campbell v Guignard,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 14, 2023
    ...will be in New Brunswick and the other in Calgary.  This approach is consistent with recent jurisprudence: for example, see CR v PS, 2022 ABQB 410 at para 64 and Barendregt at para 112. The Court must compare the scenario where Lia resides primarily in New Brunswick in Ms. Guignard......
  • Campbell v Guignard,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 14, 2023
    ...will be in New Brunswick and the other in Calgary. This approach is consistent with recent jurisprudence: for example, see CR v PS, 2022 ABQB 410 at para 64 and Barendregt at para 112. The Court must compare the scenario where Lia resides primarily in New Brunswick in Ms. Guignard's ca......
  • 2023 ABKB 217,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...will be in New Brunswick and the other in Calgary. This approach is consistent with recent jurisprudence: for example, see CR v PS, 2022 ABQB 410 at para 64 and Barendregt at para 112. The Court must compare the scenario where Lia resides primarily in New Brunswick in Ms. Guignard's ca......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Lemay v Lemay,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 24, 2023
    ...Carolina or in Calgary with the father, not whether shared parenting in Calgary was in the best interests of the parties. In CR v PS, 2022 ABQB 410, at para 64, Justice Graesser interpreted Justice Harris' decision as finding that it is unnecessary to conduct a preliminary parenting as......
  • Campbell v Guignard,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 14, 2023
    ...will be in New Brunswick and the other in Calgary.  This approach is consistent with recent jurisprudence: for example, see CR v PS, 2022 ABQB 410 at para 64 and Barendregt at para 112. The Court must compare the scenario where Lia resides primarily in New Brunswick in Ms. Guignard......
  • Campbell v Guignard,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 14, 2023
    ...will be in New Brunswick and the other in Calgary. This approach is consistent with recent jurisprudence: for example, see CR v PS, 2022 ABQB 410 at para 64 and Barendregt at para 112. The Court must compare the scenario where Lia resides primarily in New Brunswick in Ms. Guignard's ca......
  • 2023 ABKB 217,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...will be in New Brunswick and the other in Calgary. This approach is consistent with recent jurisprudence: for example, see CR v PS, 2022 ABQB 410 at para 64 and Barendregt at para 112. The Court must compare the scenario where Lia resides primarily in New Brunswick in Ms. Guignard's ca......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT