Crook v Duxbury
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Judge | Caldwell, Whitmore and Tholl JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2020 SKCA 43 |
| Docket Number | CACV3359 |
| Date | 16 April 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
Basyal v Mac's Convenience Stores Inc.
...1983 CanLII 288 (C.A.) at para. 11; Super Save Disposal Inc. v. Blazin Auto Ltd., 2011 BCSC 1784 at paras. 28–30; and Crook v. Duxbury, 2020 SKCA 43 at para. 219 While construing a contract by implication or where inference is permissible, the question of a liquidated damages contract requi......
-
THE TORONTO-DOMINON BANK v. SADER
...284; R v Moya, 2020 SKQB 260 at para 38; Honest Property Co. Ltd. v Lemaigre, 2004 SKCA 28 at para 4, 241 Sask R 313; and Crook v Duxbury, 2020 SKCA 43 at para 46, 447 DLR (4th) [15]                  &......
-
Western Courts Clarify Effect Of Mitigation In Fixed-Term Contracts
...employees dismissed under such contracts, and all three were faced with employees who in fact mitigated. Saskatchewan In Crook v Duxbury, 2020 SKCA 43 [Crook], Ms. Duxbury was employed under what the parties agreed was a fixed-term employment contract which did not contain any provision reg......
2 cases
-
Basyal v Mac's Convenience Stores Inc.
...1983 CanLII 288 (C.A.) at para. 11; Super Save Disposal Inc. v. Blazin Auto Ltd., 2011 BCSC 1784 at paras. 28–30; and Crook v. Duxbury, 2020 SKCA 43 at para. 219 While construing a contract by implication or where inference is permissible, the question of a liquidated damages contract requi......
-
THE TORONTO-DOMINON BANK v. SADER
...284; R v Moya, 2020 SKQB 260 at para 38; Honest Property Co. Ltd. v Lemaigre, 2004 SKCA 28 at para 4, 241 Sask R 313; and Crook v Duxbury, 2020 SKCA 43 at para 46, 447 DLR (4th) [15]                  &......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Western Courts Clarify Effect Of Mitigation In Fixed-Term Contracts
...employees dismissed under such contracts, and all three were faced with employees who in fact mitigated. Saskatchewan In Crook v Duxbury, 2020 SKCA 43 [Crook], Ms. Duxbury was employed under what the parties agreed was a fixed-term employment contract which did not contain any provision reg......
