Crosby v. Garcia, [2015] Sask.R. Uned. 3 (CA)
| Judge | Whitmore, J.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Case Date | January 15, 2015 |
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Citations | [2015] Sask.R. Uned. 3 (CA);2015 SKCA 4;[2015] Sask.R. Uned. 3 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
MCEWAN v. 101273356 SASKATCHEWAN LTD. and THE OFFICE OF RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES,
...discretion”. See for example: Reich v Lohse (1994), 117 DLR (4th) 1 (QL) (Sask CA) at paras 19 and 20, Crosby v Garcia, 2015 SKCA 4 and Knapp v ICR Commercial Real Estate, 2019 SKQB 59 at para 16. [4] &#......
-
Rutledge v. Ahenakew et al., 2015 QBG 240
...shown to those aspects of the rentalsman's decisions which reflect an exercise of discretion. [13] The Court of Appeal in Crosby v Garcia, 2015 SKCA 4 reaffirmed the appellate standard of review under the Act in para. 5 as follows: 5 In Reich v Lohse (1995), [1994] 123 Sask R 114 (CA), this......
2 cases
-
MCEWAN v. 101273356 SASKATCHEWAN LTD. and THE OFFICE OF RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES,
...discretion”. See for example: Reich v Lohse (1994), 117 DLR (4th) 1 (QL) (Sask CA) at paras 19 and 20, Crosby v Garcia, 2015 SKCA 4 and Knapp v ICR Commercial Real Estate, 2019 SKQB 59 at para 16. [4] &#......
-
Rutledge v. Ahenakew et al., 2015 QBG 240
...shown to those aspects of the rentalsman's decisions which reflect an exercise of discretion. [13] The Court of Appeal in Crosby v Garcia, 2015 SKCA 4 reaffirmed the appellate standard of review under the Act in para. 5 as follows: 5 In Reich v Lohse (1995), [1994] 123 Sask R 114 (CA), this......