Crowchild v. Tsuu T'ina Nation, 2017 FC 861

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Date06 October 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 practice notes
  • Landry v. Counsil of the Abénakis of Wôlinak, 2018 FC 1211
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 4, 2018
    ...not a case giving rise to the exception provided for in Rule 302 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 (Crowchild v Nation Tsuu T’ina, 2017 FC 861; Whitehead v Pelican Lake First Nation, 2009 FC 1270; Servier Canada Inc v Canada (Health), 2007 FC 196; Truehope Nutritional Support Ltd v Ca......
  • KEY FIRST NATION v. STEPHANIE C. LAVALLEE, DONALD WORME, RODNEY BRASS, ANGELA DESJARLAIS, SIDNEY KESHANE AND GLEN O'SOUP,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • June 23, 2021
    ...to extend the time within which the application could be filed. Relying on the criteria in Crowchild v. Tsuut’ina Nation, 2017 FC 861, [2018] 2 C.N.L.R. 85 (Crowchild), Walker J. noted that the applicant must demonstrate: “(i) a continuing intention to pursue the matter; (ii) ......
  • Copeau v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 325
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 21, 2021
    ...to Indian Act Certificates of Possession or other Indian Act allocations. [19] Similarly, in Crowchild v Tsuu T’ina Nation, 2017 FC 861, at paragraph 4 [Crowchild], my colleague, Justice William F. Pentney, noted the following: Tsuut’ina does not issue Certificates of Possessi......
  • Peters v. Peters First Nation, 2023 FC 399
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 23, 2023
    ...a continuing intention to pursue legal remedies in regard to the decision being challenged (Crowchild v Tsuu T’ina Nation, 2017 FC 861 at para 19). However, these factors are not rules that fetter the Court’s discretion, and it is open to a motion judge to determine which fact......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
  • Landry v. Counsil of the Abénakis of Wôlinak, 2018 FC 1211
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 4, 2018
    ...not a case giving rise to the exception provided for in Rule 302 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 (Crowchild v Nation Tsuu T’ina, 2017 FC 861; Whitehead v Pelican Lake First Nation, 2009 FC 1270; Servier Canada Inc v Canada (Health), 2007 FC 196; Truehope Nutritional Support Ltd v Ca......
  • KEY FIRST NATION v. STEPHANIE C. LAVALLEE, DONALD WORME, RODNEY BRASS, ANGELA DESJARLAIS, SIDNEY KESHANE AND GLEN O'SOUP,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • June 23, 2021
    ...to extend the time within which the application could be filed. Relying on the criteria in Crowchild v. Tsuut’ina Nation, 2017 FC 861, [2018] 2 C.N.L.R. 85 (Crowchild), Walker J. noted that the applicant must demonstrate: “(i) a continuing intention to pursue the matter; (ii) ......
  • Copeau v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 325
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 21, 2021
    ...to Indian Act Certificates of Possession or other Indian Act allocations. [19] Similarly, in Crowchild v Tsuu T’ina Nation, 2017 FC 861, at paragraph 4 [Crowchild], my colleague, Justice William F. Pentney, noted the following: Tsuut’ina does not issue Certificates of Possessi......
  • Peters v. Peters First Nation, 2023 FC 399
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 23, 2023
    ...a continuing intention to pursue legal remedies in regard to the decision being challenged (Crowchild v Tsuu T’ina Nation, 2017 FC 861 at para 19). However, these factors are not rules that fetter the Court’s discretion, and it is open to a motion judge to determine which fact......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT