CUPE v. LRB, 2005 BCSC 1366

JudgeMcEwan, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateFebruary 15, 2005
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2005 BCSC 1366;[2005] B.C.T.C. 1366 (SC)

CUPE v. LRB, [2005] B.C.T.C. 1366 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2005] B.C.T.C. TBEd. OC.043

Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 561 (petitioner) v. British Columbia Labour Relations Board, Brad Larson and The Board of School Trustees of School District No. 43 (Coquitiam) (respondents)

(L041395; 2005 BCSC 1366)

Indexed As: Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 561 v. Labour Relations Board (B.C.) et al.

British Columbia Supreme Court

Vancouver

McEwan, J.

September 28, 2005.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Labour Law - Topic 2706

Unions - Duties - To represent members of bargaining unit - See paragraphs 1 to 63.

Cases Noticed:

Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982, addendum [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1222; 226 N.R. 201; 160 D.L.R.(4th) 193, refd to. [para. 32].

Canada (Attorney General) v. Public Service Alliance of Canada, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 941; 150 N.R. 161; 101 D.L.R.(4th) 673, refd to. [para. 33].

Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Syndicat des employés de production du Québec et de l'Acadie, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 412; 55 N.R. 321; 14 D.L.R.(4th) 457, refd to. [para. 36].

Gagnon v. Canadian Merchant Service Guild and Laurentian Pilotage Authority, [1984] 1 S.C.R. 509; 53 N.R. 100, refd to. [para. 38].

Ruby Chow and Overwaitea Foods, Re, [1981] 3 C.L.R.B.R. 43, refd to. [para. 39].

Rayonier Canada (B.C.) Ltd., Re, [1975] 2 C.L.R.B.R. 196, refd to. [para. 44].

Franco v. Hospital Employees' Union (1994), 22 C.L.R.B.R.(2d) 281 (B.C.), refd to. [para. 44].

Counsel:

P. Dickie, for the petitioner;

E. Miller, for the respondent, B.C. Labour Relations Board;

A. Wills, for the respondent, Board of School Trustees of School District No. 43 (Coquitlam).

This case was heard on February 15, 2005, before McEwan, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on September 28, 2005.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 practice notes
5 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT