Daniels et al. v. Canada (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development) et al., [2005] F.T.R. Uned. A60
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Martineau, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE |
| Date | 15 August 2005 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Manitoba Métis Federation Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al.,
...21]. Daniels et al. v. Canada (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development) et al., [2005] F.T.R. Uned. A60; 18 E.T.R.(3d) 312; 2005 FC 1109, refd to. [para. Daniels et al. v. Canada (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development) et al., [2008] F.T.R. Uned. 576; 2008 FC 823, ......
-
Federal Court Declares Métis And Non-Status Indians Part Of Federal Jurisdiction Over 'Indians And Lands Reserved For Indians'
...the plaintiffs to replace him with two other individuals (2005 FC 699), a decision that was then unsuccessfully appealed by Canada (2005 FC 1109). The TCFP funding also expired during the course of litigation, which triggered a successful contested motion for advance costs by the plaintiffs......
1 cases
-
Manitoba Métis Federation Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al.,
...21]. Daniels et al. v. Canada (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development) et al., [2005] F.T.R. Uned. A60; 18 E.T.R.(3d) 312; 2005 FC 1109, refd to. [para. Daniels et al. v. Canada (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development) et al., [2008] F.T.R. Uned. 576; 2008 FC 823, ......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Federal Court Declares Métis And Non-Status Indians Part Of Federal Jurisdiction Over 'Indians And Lands Reserved For Indians'
...the plaintiffs to replace him with two other individuals (2005 FC 699), a decision that was then unsuccessfully appealed by Canada (2005 FC 1109). The TCFP funding also expired during the course of litigation, which triggered a successful contested motion for advance costs by the plaintiffs......
1 books & journal articles
-
Are the Métis in Section 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867? An Issue Caught in a Time-Warp
...Affairs and Northern Development) , [2002] 4 F.C. 550 (t.D.). 30 Daniels v. Canada (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development) , 2005 FC 1109, [2005] 4 C.n.l.r. 156. 31 Haida Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests) , [2004] 3 s.C.r. 511 at para. 16. 32 Dumont v. Canada (A......