Davies v. Todd
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada) |
| Judge | Paull |
| Citation | 2022 ONCJ 178 |
| Date | 28 March 2022 |
| Docket Number | D44/21 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 practice notes
-
B.C.J.B. v. E.-R.R.R.
...para 24 [Tipay]; Steiner v Mazzotta, 2022 BCSC 827 at para 5 [Steiner]; Rashid v Avanesov, 2022 ONSC 3401(WL) at para 85; Davies v Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178 at para 44 [Davies]; and G.W. v C.M., 2022 BCPC 29 at para 5 [46] Judicial notice has been taken of the fact that contracting COVID-19 poses......
-
Inglis v Inglis
...para 24 [Tipay]; Steiner v Mazzotta, 2022 BCSC 827 at para 5 [Steiner]; Rashid v Avanesov, 2022 ONSC 3401(WL) at para 85; Davies v Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178 at para 44 [Davies]; and G.W. v C.M., 2022 BCPC 29 at para 5 [G.W.]. [46] Judicial notice has been taken of the fact that contracting COVID-......
-
D.E. v W.E.
...para 24 [Tipay]; Steiner v Mazzotta, 2022 BCSC 827 at para 5 [Steiner]; Rashid v Avanesov, 2022 ONSC 3401(WL) at para 85; Davies v Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178 at para 44 [Davies]; and G.W. v C.M., 2022 BCPC 29 at para 5 [46] Judicial notice has been taken of the fact that contracting COVID-19 poses......
-
M.M. v. W.A.K.
...para 24 [Tipay]; Steiner v Mazzotta, 2022 BCSC 827 at para 5 [Steiner]; Rashid v Avanesov, 2022 ONSC 3401 (WL) at para 85; Davies v Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178 at para 44 [Davies]; and G.W. v C.M., 2022 BCPC 29 at para 5 [46] Judicial notice has been taken of the fact that contracting COVID-19 pose......
Get Started for Free
3 cases
-
J.N. v C.G.
...unless there is a compelling reason not to: Dyquiangco Jr. v. Tipay, 2022 ONSC 1441; Rashid v. Ayanesov, 2022 ONSC 3401; Davies v. Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178. 21 In this case, the motion judge declined to do so, taking the position that the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine is not a notoriou......
-
Irwin v Manley
...into a new phase of the pandemic, which brings with it changes in the threat posed by the COVID-19 virus. For example, in Davies v. Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178, the court granted the vaccinated father sole decision-making authority with respect to the children's vaccination status, but ordered......
-
Rayner v The British Columbia Coast Pilots Ltd
...into a new phase of the pandemic, which brings with it changes in the threat posed by the COVID-19 virus. For example, in Davies v. Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178, the court granted the vaccinated father sole decision-making authority with respect to the children's vaccination status, but ordered......
