Davies v. Todd,
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Paull |
| Citation | 2022 ONCJ 178 |
| Docket Number | D44/21 |
| Court | Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada) |
| Date | 28 March 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
2023 ONCA 77,
...unless there is a compelling reason not to: Dyquiangco Jr. v. Tipay, 2022 ONSC 1441; Rashid v. Ayanesov, 2022 ONSC 3401; Davies v. Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178. 21 In this case, the motion judge declined to do so, taking the position that the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine is not a notoriou......
-
J.N. v C.G.,
...unless there is a compelling reason not to: Dyquiangco Jr. v. Tipay, 2022 ONSC 1441; Rashid v. Ayanesov, 2022 ONSC 3401; Davies v. Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178. 21 In this case, the motion judge declined to do so, taking the position that the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine is not a notoriou......
-
2023 BCSC 137,
...into a new phase of the pandemic, which brings with it changes in the threat posed by the COVID-19 virus. For example, in Davies v. Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178, the court granted the vaccinated father sole decision-making authority with respect to the children's vaccination status, but ordered......
-
2023 BCSC 373,
...into a new phase of the pandemic, which brings with it changes in the threat posed by the COVID-19 virus. For example, in Davies v. Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178, the court granted the vaccinated father sole decision-making authority with respect to the children's vaccination status, but ordered......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
2023 ONCA 77,
...unless there is a compelling reason not to: Dyquiangco Jr. v. Tipay, 2022 ONSC 1441; Rashid v. Ayanesov, 2022 ONSC 3401; Davies v. Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178. 21 In this case, the motion judge declined to do so, taking the position that the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine is not a notoriou......
-
J.N. v C.G.,
...unless there is a compelling reason not to: Dyquiangco Jr. v. Tipay, 2022 ONSC 1441; Rashid v. Ayanesov, 2022 ONSC 3401; Davies v. Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178. 21 In this case, the motion judge declined to do so, taking the position that the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine is not a notoriou......
-
2023 BCSC 137,
...into a new phase of the pandemic, which brings with it changes in the threat posed by the COVID-19 virus. For example, in Davies v. Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178, the court granted the vaccinated father sole decision-making authority with respect to the children's vaccination status, but ordered......
-
2023 BCSC 373,
...into a new phase of the pandemic, which brings with it changes in the threat posed by the COVID-19 virus. For example, in Davies v. Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178, the court granted the vaccinated father sole decision-making authority with respect to the children's vaccination status, but ordered......
Request a trial to view additional results