Davies v. Todd,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgePaull
Citation2022 ONCJ 178
Docket NumberD44/21
CourtOntario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
Date28 March 2022

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 practice notes
  • J.N. v C.G.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • February 3, 2023
    ...unless there is a compelling reason not to: Dyquiangco Jr. v. Tipay, 2022 ONSC 1441; Rashid v. Ayanesov, 2022 ONSC 3401; Davies v. Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178. 21 In this case, the motion judge declined to do so, taking the position that the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine is not a notoriou......
  • 2023 ONCA 77,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...unless there is a compelling reason not to: Dyquiangco Jr. v. Tipay, 2022 ONSC 1441; Rashid v. Ayanesov, 2022 ONSC 3401; Davies v. Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178. 21 In this case, the motion judge declined to do so, taking the position that the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine is not a notoriou......
  • 2023 BCSC 137,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...into a new phase of the pandemic, which brings with it changes in the threat posed by the COVID-19 virus. For example, in Davies v. Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178, the court granted the vaccinated father sole decision-making authority with respect to the children's vaccination status, but ordered......
  • 2023 BCSC 373,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...into a new phase of the pandemic, which brings with it changes in the threat posed by the COVID-19 virus. For example, in Davies v. Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178, the court granted the vaccinated father sole decision-making authority with respect to the children's vaccination status, but ordered......
  • Get Started for Free
6 cases
  • J.N. v C.G.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • February 3, 2023
    ...unless there is a compelling reason not to: Dyquiangco Jr. v. Tipay, 2022 ONSC 1441; Rashid v. Ayanesov, 2022 ONSC 3401; Davies v. Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178. 21 In this case, the motion judge declined to do so, taking the position that the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine is not a notoriou......
  • 2023 ONCA 77,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...unless there is a compelling reason not to: Dyquiangco Jr. v. Tipay, 2022 ONSC 1441; Rashid v. Ayanesov, 2022 ONSC 3401; Davies v. Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178. 21 In this case, the motion judge declined to do so, taking the position that the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine is not a notoriou......
  • 2023 BCSC 137,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...into a new phase of the pandemic, which brings with it changes in the threat posed by the COVID-19 virus. For example, in Davies v. Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178, the court granted the vaccinated father sole decision-making authority with respect to the children's vaccination status, but ordered......
  • 2023 BCSC 373,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...into a new phase of the pandemic, which brings with it changes in the threat posed by the COVID-19 virus. For example, in Davies v. Todd, 2022 ONCJ 178, the court granted the vaccinated father sole decision-making authority with respect to the children's vaccination status, but ordered......
  • Get Started for Free