Davy v. Davy, 2019 BCSC 1826
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Gomery |
| Citation | 2019 BCSC 1826 |
| Date | 24 October 2019 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | S98851 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Young v. Veselic,
...McMaster Estate at para. 134. I do not find that any of those factors exist here. [129] In Davy v. Davy, 2019 BCSC 1826, the testatrix transferred joint title in her home to one of her sons. The court found the son had exerted undue influence. The mother was financia......
-
Kalanj v. Kalanj Estate,
...on this summary trial. Hearsay statements cannot be tested by cross-examination and are presumptively inadmissible: Davy v. Davy, 2019 BCSC 1826 at para. 26 [Davy]. However, the presumption of inadmissibility may be overcome if admission of the statement is necessary and the sur......
-
Woods v. Woods,
...reversed on other grounds 2017 SCC 61; Royal Bank of Canada v. Hinds, [1978] 20 O.R. (2d) 613 (S.C), at para. 8; Davy v. Davy, 2019 BCSC 1826 at [67] In the present case: a) The contra......
-
Styres v. Martin, 2021 ONSC 1072
...the Property to the defendant was therefore not gratuitous. [86] In the case of Davy v. Davy, 2019 BCSC 1826 (B.C.S.C.) Gomery, J. held at para. 92 that “a transaction is not gratuitous where the transferee contributed something of value to t......
4 cases
-
Young v. Veselic,
...McMaster Estate at para. 134. I do not find that any of those factors exist here. [129] In Davy v. Davy, 2019 BCSC 1826, the testatrix transferred joint title in her home to one of her sons. The court found the son had exerted undue influence. The mother was financia......
-
Kalanj v. Kalanj Estate,
...on this summary trial. Hearsay statements cannot be tested by cross-examination and are presumptively inadmissible: Davy v. Davy, 2019 BCSC 1826 at para. 26 [Davy]. However, the presumption of inadmissibility may be overcome if admission of the statement is necessary and the sur......
-
Woods v. Woods,
...reversed on other grounds 2017 SCC 61; Royal Bank of Canada v. Hinds, [1978] 20 O.R. (2d) 613 (S.C), at para. 8; Davy v. Davy, 2019 BCSC 1826 at [67] In the present case: a) The contra......
-
Styres v. Martin, 2021 ONSC 1072
...the Property to the defendant was therefore not gratuitous. [86] In the case of Davy v. Davy, 2019 BCSC 1826 (B.C.S.C.) Gomery, J. held at para. 92 that “a transaction is not gratuitous where the transferee contributed something of value to t......