Deb et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 433
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Gascon, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,PRACTICE,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW |
| Citation | [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 433,[2015] F.T.R. Uned. 433 (FC),2015 FC 1069 |
| Date | 11 September 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1 practice notes
-
Figueroa et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 521
...courts ( Kamburona v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FC 1052 at para 18); Deb v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2015 FC 1069 at para 13; Dunsmuir v New Brunswick , 2008 SCC 9 at para 53 [ Dunsmuir ]). [14] Reasonableness is concerned with the existence of justification, tr......
2 cases
-
Figueroa et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 521
...courts ( Kamburona v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FC 1052 at para 18); Deb v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2015 FC 1069 at para 13; Dunsmuir v New Brunswick , 2008 SCC 9 at para 53 [ Dunsmuir ]). [14] Reasonableness is concerned with the existence of justification, tr......
-
Enam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1683
...FC 1172, at paras 1, 7; Molefe v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 317 at para 35; Deb v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 1069 at paras 2, 8, 19). [19] The Applicants argue that the RAD erred by ignoring portions of their testimony regarding: 1) the forward-looking ......