Dedam v. R.
| Jurisdiction | New Brunswick |
| Court | Court of Appeal (New Brunswick) |
| Judge | Green,Quigg,Richard |
| Citation | 2022 NBCA 41 |
| Date | 11 August 2022 |
| Docket Number | 57-21-CA |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 practice notes
-
R. v. BULMER
...of a W.(D.) analyses is required and the evidence subject to a reasonable doubt standard. R v. W.(D.) [1991] SCR 742 and Dedam v. R, 2022 NBCA 41) 293. The well-known W.(D.) analysis framework on credibility when an accused gives evidence or there is exculpatory evidence otherwise, is set o......
-
Nagle v. R.
...of law (Sinclair, at paras. 4, 26 and 77). [Emphasis added; paras. 28-30] See also Russell v. R., 2021 NBCA 19, at para. 41; Dedam v. R, 2022 NBCA 41, [2021] N.B.J. No. 104 (QL), at para. [18] We reiterate that, for a conviction under s. 279(2) of the Code, a trial judge must be satisfied b......
-
McGraw v. R.
...will rarely be successful (see Dinardo, at para. 26; Vuradin, at para. 11). This Court has applied the above reasoning in Dedam v. R., 2022 NBCA 41, [2022] N.B.J. No. 189 (QL), per Quigg J.A., at para. 68, and in Figg v. R., 2022 NBCA 30, [2022] N.B.J. No. 148 (QL), at para. [23] In the abo......
-
Eatmon v. R.
...frailty in the evidence or to refer to all the conflicting evidence to set out every finding made in reaching a verdict (Dedam v. R., 2022 NBCA 41, [2022] N.B.J. No. 189 (QL)). However, reasons must be factually and legally sufficient. Factual sufficiency requires the judge to state why a d......
Get Started for Free
9 cases
-
R. v. BULMER
...of a W.(D.) analyses is required and the evidence subject to a reasonable doubt standard. R v. W.(D.) [1991] SCR 742 and Dedam v. R, 2022 NBCA 41) 293. The well-known W.(D.) analysis framework on credibility when an accused gives evidence or there is exculpatory evidence otherwise, is set o......
-
Nagle v. R.
...of law (Sinclair, at paras. 4, 26 and 77). [Emphasis added; paras. 28-30] See also Russell v. R., 2021 NBCA 19, at para. 41; Dedam v. R, 2022 NBCA 41, [2021] N.B.J. No. 104 (QL), at para. [18] We reiterate that, for a conviction under s. 279(2) of the Code, a trial judge must be satisfied b......
-
McGraw v. R.
...will rarely be successful (see Dinardo, at para. 26; Vuradin, at para. 11). This Court has applied the above reasoning in Dedam v. R., 2022 NBCA 41, [2022] N.B.J. No. 189 (QL), per Quigg J.A., at para. 68, and in Figg v. R., 2022 NBCA 30, [2022] N.B.J. No. 148 (QL), at para. [23] In the abo......
-
Eatmon v. R.
...frailty in the evidence or to refer to all the conflicting evidence to set out every finding made in reaching a verdict (Dedam v. R., 2022 NBCA 41, [2022] N.B.J. No. 189 (QL)). However, reasons must be factually and legally sufficient. Factual sufficiency requires the judge to state why a d......
Get Started for Free
