Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs, [2007] 2 SCR 801

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, Beverley; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; LeBel, Louis; Deschamps, Marie; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Charron, Louise; Rothstein, Marshall
Citation[2007] 2 SCR 801,2007 SCC 34,EYB 2007-121973,JE 2007-1426,366 NR 1,[2007] SCJ No 34 (QL),34 BLR (4th) 155,[2007] ACS no 34,284 DLR (4th) 577
Docket Number31067
Subject MatterCONFLICT OF LAWS,ARBITRATION,INTERNATIONAL LAW
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date13 July 2007
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
193 practice notes
  • Alberta (Treasury Branches) v. McKinnon, 2013 ABQB 371
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 25, 2013
    ...[2009] O.T.C. Uned. D48; 2009 CanLII 28205 (Ont. S.C.), refd to. [para. 13]. Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs et al., [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801; 366 N.R. 1; 2007 SCC 34, refd to. [para. University of British Columbia v. Association of Administrative and Professional Staff et al. (20......
  • Green et al. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce et al., (2015) 346 O.A.C. 204 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 4, 2015
    ...et al., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 392; 382 N.R. 105; 2008 SCC 64, refd to. [para. 62]. Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs et al., [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801; 366 N.R. 1; 2007 SCC 34, refd to. [para. Turner v. London and South-Western Railway Co. (1874), L.R. 17 Eq. 561, refd to. [para. 87]. Gunn......
  • Malhab v. Diffusion Métromédia CMR inc. et al., [2011] N.R. TBEd. FE.029
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 15, 2009
    ...[2006] 1 S.C.R. 666; 348 N.R. 201; 2006 SCC 19, refd to. [para. 52]. Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs et al., [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801; 366 N.R. 1; 2007 SCC 34, refd to. [para. Ortenberg v. Plamondon (1915), 24 B.R. 69 (Que. C.A.), consd. [paras. 60, 113]. Zhang et al. v. Chau et a......
  • Sharp v. Autorité des marchés financiers, 2023 SCC 29
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 17, 2023
    ...[1941] S.C.R. 448; Gignac v. Gauvin, 2009 QCCS 524, 73 C.C.P.B. 47; Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs, 2007 SCC 34, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801; Barer v. Knight Brothers LLC, 2019 SCC 13, [2019] 1 S.C.R. 573; Ormuco inc. v. Ernst & Young, 2022 QCCA 405; Mines d’or Visible in......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
125 cases
  • Alberta (Treasury Branches) v. McKinnon, 2013 ABQB 371
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 25, 2013
    ...[2009] O.T.C. Uned. D48; 2009 CanLII 28205 (Ont. S.C.), refd to. [para. 13]. Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs et al., [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801; 366 N.R. 1; 2007 SCC 34, refd to. [para. University of British Columbia v. Association of Administrative and Professional Staff et al. (20......
  • Green et al. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce et al., (2015) 346 O.A.C. 204 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • December 4, 2015
    ...et al., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 392; 382 N.R. 105; 2008 SCC 64, refd to. [para. 62]. Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs et al., [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801; 366 N.R. 1; 2007 SCC 34, refd to. [para. Turner v. London and South-Western Railway Co. (1874), L.R. 17 Eq. 561, refd to. [para. 87]. Gunn......
  • Malhab v. Diffusion Métromédia CMR inc. et al., [2011] N.R. TBEd. FE.029
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • December 15, 2009
    ...[2006] 1 S.C.R. 666; 348 N.R. 201; 2006 SCC 19, refd to. [para. 52]. Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs et al., [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801; 366 N.R. 1; 2007 SCC 34, refd to. [para. Ortenberg v. Plamondon (1915), 24 B.R. 69 (Que. C.A.), consd. [paras. 60, 113]. Zhang et al. v. Chau et a......
  • Seidel v. Telus Communications Inc., (2011) 301 B.C.A.C. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • May 12, 2010
    ...(2010), 259 O.A.C. 108 ; 98 O.R.(3d) 481 ; 2010 ONCA 29 , refd to. [para. 1]. Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs et al., [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801; 366 N.R. 1 ; 2007 SCC 34 , refd to. [paras. 4, 65]. Muroff v. Rogers Wireless Inc., [2007] 2 S.C.R. 921 ; 365 N.R. 177 ; 2007 SCC ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
13 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 22, 2022 ' August 26, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 29, 2022
    ...Systems Inc. v. Bracknell Corp. (1994), 18 O.R. (3d) 257 (C.A.), Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs, 2007 SCC 34, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801, Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 SCC 16, 447 D.L.R. (4th) 179, Rogers Wireless Inc. v. Muroff, 2007 SCC 35, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 921, Canada (A......
  • Strategies To Avoid Or Mitigate Class Action Litigation - Quest For The Silver Bullet*
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 20, 2012
    ...law continues to apply as it would to a traditional individual proceeding." See also Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801, at paras. 105-107: "The class action is a procedure, and its purpose is not to create a new right. ... [The] class action is clearly of p......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Reaffirms That Agreements To Arbitrate Are Strictly Enforced
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 2, 2017
    ...such provisions and stay court proceedings in favour of arbitration. Footnotes [1] Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801, at para. 84. See also Seidel v. Telus Communications Inc. [2011] 1 S.C.R. 531, at para. 4; also Ciano Trading & Services C.T. v. Skylink......
  • The Appeal in Teal: SCC Majority Restores Commercial Arbitrator's Award
    • Canada
    • JD Supra Canada
    • June 29, 2017
    ...81 and 83. 7 See Desputeaux v. Ēditions Chouette (1987) Inc, [2003] 1 SCR 178, at p. 217; Dell Computer Corp. v Union des consommateurs, [2007] 2 SCR 801, at para 1, 169 and 176-178; Seidel v TELUS Communications Inc., [2011] 1 SCR 531, per LeBel and Deschamps JJ. (dissenting), at para 52 a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
53 books & journal articles
  • An Old Snail in a New Bottle? Waiver of Tort as An Independent Cause of Action
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 6-1, April 2010
    • April 1, 2010
    ...to apply as it would to a traditional individual proceeding.”) [Bisaillon]. See also Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801 at paras. 105–7 [Dell] (“The class action is a procedure, and its purpose is not to create a new right . . . . [The] class action is clear......
  • Speaking the Class Action, Thinking the Class Action: A Discussion of Changing Trends in Quebec's Class Action Lexicon
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 6-1, April 2010
    • April 1, 2010
    ...to apply as it would to a traditional individual proceeding.”) [Bisaillon]. See also Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801 at paras. 105–7 [Dell] (“The class action is a procedure, and its purpose is not to create a new right . . . . [The] class action is clear......
  • Class Arbitration in Canada: The Legal and Business Case
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 6-2, December 2010
    • December 1, 2010
    ...class proceedings and deference to parties’ consensual choice of arbitration. 7 8 9 [2006] 1 S.C.R. 666 , 2006 SCC 19 [Bisaillon]. [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801, 2007 SCC 34 [Dell]. [2007] 2 S.C.R. 921 , 2007 SCC 35 [Rogers]. CCAR Vol 6 No 2 .indb 386 23/12/ 2010 1:03 :55 PM Volume 6, N o 2,......
  • Strategies to Avoid Or Mitigate Class Action Litigation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 6-1, April 2010
    • April 1, 2010
    ...to apply as it would to a traditional individual proceeding.”) [Bisaillon]. See also Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801 at paras. 105–7 [Dell] (“The class action is a procedure, and its purpose is not to create a new right . . . . [The] class action is clear......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT