Deluca v. Alberta (Law Enforcement Review Board), 2018 ABCA 340

JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Brian O’Ferrall,The Honourable Mr. Justice Thomas W. Wakeling,The Honourable Madam Justice Jo'Anne Strekaf
Citation2018 ABCA 340
Date18 October 2018
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Docket Number1703-0060-AC 1703-0092-AC 1701-0163-AC
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 practice notes
  • Glamorgan Landing Estates GP Inc. v Calgary (City),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • May 7, 2024
    ...assigning to words an impermissible meaning. This is an affront to the rule of law”) & Deluca v. Law Enforcement Review Board, 2018 ABCA 340, ¶ 71; 77 Alta. L.R. 6th 35, 75, leave to appeal ref'd, [2018] S.C.C.A. No. 522 & [2018] S.C.C.A. No. 523, leave to reconsider granted, 2020 A......
  • Edmonton (Police Service) v Deluca, 2022 ABCA 86
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 10, 2022
    ...2007 ABCA 147, 73 Alta LR (4th) 205, 404 AR 262 and Deluca v Alberta (Law Enforcement Review Board) (“Deluca #1”), 2018 ABCA 340, 77 Alta LR (6th) 35. In this appeal, the Chief of Police argues that Murdoch and Deluca #1 do not correctly set out the procedures that are availab......
  • Edmonton (Police Service) v Deluca, 2020 ABCA 31
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 27, 2020
    ...necessary or required, the Chief also asks for permission that this court reconsider Deluca v Alberta (Law Enforcement Review Board), 2018 ABCA 340 [Deluca]. The respondents Csts. T. Deluca and T. Paulino oppose the application. The Law Enforcement Review Board (the “Board”) takes no positi......
  • Edmonton (Police Service) v Deluca, 2020 ABCA 123
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 26, 2020
    ...the appeals should it determine that the challenged action is disciplinary in nature: Deluca v Alberta (Law Enforcement Review Board), 2018 ABCA 340 [Deluca #1], leave to appeal to SCC refused, 38447 (18 April 2019). [5] In accordance with this Court’s judgment in Deluca #1, the LERB electe......
4 cases
  • Glamorgan Landing Estates GP Inc. v Calgary (City),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • May 7, 2024
    ...assigning to words an impermissible meaning. This is an affront to the rule of law”) & Deluca v. Law Enforcement Review Board, 2018 ABCA 340, ¶ 71; 77 Alta. L.R. 6th 35, 75, leave to appeal ref'd, [2018] S.C.C.A. No. 522 & [2018] S.C.C.A. No. 523, leave to reconsider granted, 2020 A......
  • Edmonton (Police Service) v Deluca, 2022 ABCA 86
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 10, 2022
    ...2007 ABCA 147, 73 Alta LR (4th) 205, 404 AR 262 and Deluca v Alberta (Law Enforcement Review Board) (“Deluca #1”), 2018 ABCA 340, 77 Alta LR (6th) 35. In this appeal, the Chief of Police argues that Murdoch and Deluca #1 do not correctly set out the procedures that are availab......
  • Edmonton (Police Service) v Deluca, 2020 ABCA 31
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 27, 2020
    ...necessary or required, the Chief also asks for permission that this court reconsider Deluca v Alberta (Law Enforcement Review Board), 2018 ABCA 340 [Deluca]. The respondents Csts. T. Deluca and T. Paulino oppose the application. The Law Enforcement Review Board (the “Board”) takes no positi......
  • Edmonton (Police Service) v Deluca, 2020 ABCA 123
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 26, 2020
    ...the appeals should it determine that the challenged action is disciplinary in nature: Deluca v Alberta (Law Enforcement Review Board), 2018 ABCA 340 [Deluca #1], leave to appeal to SCC refused, 38447 (18 April 2019). [5] In accordance with this Court’s judgment in Deluca #1, the LERB electe......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT