Deol v. Dreyer Davison LLP, 2020 BCSC 771

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHonourable Madam Justice Marzari
Citation2020 BCSC 771
Date22 May 2020
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket NumberS1911858
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Class Actions, Workplace Harassment, and Discrimination Disputes: a Case Study of Lewis v Westjet Airlines LTD
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 17-2, March 2022
    • 1 Marzo 2022
    ...(blog) online: www.lexology.com/ library/detail. aspx?g=16895968-ac58-43b3-be71-da8d33c91a82. 23 Ibid. 24 Deol v Dreyer Davison LLP, 2020 BCSC 771 [Deol]; Human Rights Code, RSBC 1996, c 210 [BC HRC]. 164 The Ca nadia n Cl a ss aCTion R eview | volume 17 • no 2 sexual harassment by a named ......
  • Humphrey v. Mene,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 4 Mayo 2021
    ...if she “show[ed] interest” and if the Board “still consider[ed] that option as a viable alternative.” [34] In Deol v. Dreyer Davison LLP, 2020 BCSC 771 (“Deol”), at paras. 28-29, the court set out the principles for determining whether there has been a constructive 27 In Potter v New Brunsw......
  • Smith v Lafarge Canada Inc,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 20 Abril 2022
    ...of the factual matrix supporting the punitive damages claim, although the law in this area appears unsettled (Deol v Dreyer Davison LLP, 2020 BCSC 771 at paras 140-170). [51]        If, in contrast, Mr Smith’s claim is for discrete damages for age d......
2 cases
  • Humphrey v. Mene,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 4 Mayo 2021
    ...if she “show[ed] interest” and if the Board “still consider[ed] that option as a viable alternative.” [34] In Deol v. Dreyer Davison LLP, 2020 BCSC 771 (“Deol”), at paras. 28-29, the court set out the principles for determining whether there has been a constructive 27 In Potter v New Brunsw......
  • Smith v Lafarge Canada Inc,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 20 Abril 2022
    ...of the factual matrix supporting the punitive damages claim, although the law in this area appears unsettled (Deol v Dreyer Davison LLP, 2020 BCSC 771 at paras 140-170). [51]        If, in contrast, Mr Smith’s claim is for discrete damages for age d......
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT