Dermaspark Products Inc v. Patel
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2023 FC 388 |
| Date | 21 March 2023 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
Patel v. Dermaspark Products Inc.
...POLLOGEN LTD. Respondents REASONS FOR JUDGMENT STRATAS J.A. [1] This is an appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court (per Kane J.): 2023 FC 388. The Federal Court decided that the appellants were liable, jointly and severally, in the amount of $45,000, representing statutory damages of ......
-
Louis Dreyfus Company Canada ULC v. Canadian National Railway Company
...v General Entertainment and Music Inc, 2024 FC 1127 at paras 91‑92 [Demirören]). They also point to Dermaspark Products Inc v Patel, 2023 FC 388 [Dermaspark Products], at para [424] One of the factors this Court may consider in exercising its discretion to set an interest rate is the m......
-
Ecolab USA Inc. v. 2431717 Ontario Inc. (3D Eco Chemical Labs Canada)
...was awarded $15,000 for only 1.5 years of illegal use after being made aware of illegal activities. In Dermaspark Products Inc v Patel, 2023 FC 388, the plaintiff was awarded $20,000 where the length of time of use of the infringing mark by the defendant’s was 2 years. In the case before me......
-
Burberry Limited v. Ward
...from whom they obtain Counterfeit Merchandise. A similar order was recently granted by the Court in Dermaspark Products Inc v Patel, 2023 FC 388. (ii) Third party order [82] The Ward Defendants rely on third parties to conduct their infringing activities. These third parties include shippin......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
Patel v. Dermaspark Products Inc.
...POLLOGEN LTD. Respondents REASONS FOR JUDGMENT STRATAS J.A. [1] This is an appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court (per Kane J.): 2023 FC 388. The Federal Court decided that the appellants were liable, jointly and severally, in the amount of $45,000, representing statutory damages of ......
-
Louis Dreyfus Company Canada ULC v. Canadian National Railway Company
...v General Entertainment and Music Inc, 2024 FC 1127 at paras 91‑92 [Demirören]). They also point to Dermaspark Products Inc v Patel, 2023 FC 388 [Dermaspark Products], at para [424] One of the factors this Court may consider in exercising its discretion to set an interest rate is the m......
-
Ecolab USA Inc. v. 2431717 Ontario Inc. (3D Eco Chemical Labs Canada)
...was awarded $15,000 for only 1.5 years of illegal use after being made aware of illegal activities. In Dermaspark Products Inc v Patel, 2023 FC 388, the plaintiff was awarded $20,000 where the length of time of use of the infringing mark by the defendant’s was 2 years. In the case before me......
-
Lounge Medical Spa Ltd. v. DermaSpark Products Inc.
...Dermaspark Products Inc. v. Aveena Cosmetic Clinic Inc., 2025 FC 1350 (Aveena (1350)) - $15,000; Dermaspark Products Inc. v. Patel, 2023 FC 388 - $20,000; Dermaspark Products Inc. c. Étienne, 2023 QCCS 1268 - $20,000 per plaintiff; and most recently Dermaspark Products Inc. v. Ottamann (Adm......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
When Not To Seek A Summary Trial!
...to Seek a Summary Trial! Dermaspark Products Inc v. Patel 2023 FC 388 A defendant categorized the plaintiff's claims as an abuse of process and asserted the plaintiff was a "trademark bully". The defendant brought a motion for summary trial to dismiss the plaintiff's The Facts The plaintiff......
