Do v. Nichols et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1069 (SC)

JudgeSmith, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateJune 22, 2015
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1069 (SC);2015 BCSC 1069;[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1069
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1 practice notes
  • Do v. Nichols et al., 2016 BCCA 128
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 17 Febrero 2016
    ...Skolrood, in reasons indexed at 2014 BCSC 1082 , referred the petition to the trial list. [2] The trial judge, in reasons indexed at 2015 BCSC 1069, found that the contractual provision giving rise to the mortgage was a penalty clause and unconscionable. He granted relief pursuant to s. 24......
1 cases
  • Do v. Nichols et al., 2016 BCCA 128
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 17 Febrero 2016
    ...Skolrood, in reasons indexed at 2014 BCSC 1082 , referred the petition to the trial list. [2] The trial judge, in reasons indexed at 2015 BCSC 1069, found that the contractual provision giving rise to the mortgage was a penalty clause and unconscionable. He granted relief pursuant to s. 24......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT