Dougal & Co Inc v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 1075
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2017 FC 1075 |
| Date | 29 November 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Castro Lopez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 197
...and its underlying authorities, no new evidence was placed before the Court (Atim at para 38; Dougal & Co v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 1075 at paras 21-25). As Mr. Monroy was no longer retained, it was also implicit he had no authority to file additional submissions to LAO, and ......
-
Zhang v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 356
...the Minister with all necessary evidence prior to the rendering of the decision (see Dougal & Co Inc v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 1075 at para 23). As such, I will not take the Disputed Documents into account in this application. However, nothing turns on this determination, as ......
-
Atim v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 695
...this argument was not put to the RAD and so cannot be used to now impugn the Decision (Dougal & Co Inc v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 1075 at para 24). [39] Therefore, I find that it was open to the RAD to refuse the Applicant’s request to reopen her appeal, based on the evidence ......
-
Abou-Rached v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 750
...(Attorney General), 2019 FC 235; Takenaka v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 347; Dougal & Co Inc v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 1075; Biswal v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 529; Ford v Canada (Attorney General), 2015 FC 1057 (in which the Minister of National Revenue was c......
4 cases
-
Castro Lopez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 197
...and its underlying authorities, no new evidence was placed before the Court (Atim at para 38; Dougal & Co v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 1075 at paras 21-25). As Mr. Monroy was no longer retained, it was also implicit he had no authority to file additional submissions to LAO, and ......
-
Zhang v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 356
...the Minister with all necessary evidence prior to the rendering of the decision (see Dougal & Co Inc v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 1075 at para 23). As such, I will not take the Disputed Documents into account in this application. However, nothing turns on this determination, as ......
-
Atim v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 695
...this argument was not put to the RAD and so cannot be used to now impugn the Decision (Dougal & Co Inc v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 1075 at para 24). [39] Therefore, I find that it was open to the RAD to refuse the Applicant’s request to reopen her appeal, based on the evidence ......
-
Abou-Rached v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 750
...(Attorney General), 2019 FC 235; Takenaka v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 347; Dougal & Co Inc v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 1075; Biswal v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 529; Ford v Canada (Attorney General), 2015 FC 1057 (in which the Minister of National Revenue was c......