Douillard v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 390

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
Citation2019 FC 390
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Date29 March 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Solis Mendoza v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 203
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 4, 2021
    ...section 96 or 97 if the child’s claim would otherwise be rejected”, see Douillard v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 390 [LeBlanc J]: [24] While the best interests of the child are an indispensable criterion for decisions made under section 25 of the Act, which ar......
  • Zidan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 170
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 23, 2021
    ...BIOC be taken into account in a procedural, not a substantive manner, as explained in Douillard v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 390, at paras 24-30; see also Kim v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 149, at paras 7-9. [41] The applicants also raised very understan......
  • Armando v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 94
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 22, 2020
    ...claims for unaccompanied minors and the elicitation and evaluation of evidence (Douillard v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 390 at para 27; Homaire v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1197 at para 50; Kim at paras 7-9, 76; Henry v Canada (Citizenship and ......
  • Okbet v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 25, 2021
    ...the RPD not capable of supporting a positive determination of her claim on its own, see Douillard v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 390 [LeBlanc J, as he was then] at para 17. [53] See also Rahaman v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2002 FCA 89 [Evans JA] at p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Solis Mendoza v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 203
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 4, 2021
    ...section 96 or 97 if the child’s claim would otherwise be rejected”, see Douillard v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 390 [LeBlanc J]: [24] While the best interests of the child are an indispensable criterion for decisions made under section 25 of the Act, which ar......
  • Zidan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 170
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 23, 2021
    ...BIOC be taken into account in a procedural, not a substantive manner, as explained in Douillard v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 390, at paras 24-30; see also Kim v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 149, at paras 7-9. [41] The applicants also raised very understan......
  • Armando v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 94
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 22, 2020
    ...claims for unaccompanied minors and the elicitation and evaluation of evidence (Douillard v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 390 at para 27; Homaire v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1197 at para 50; Kim at paras 7-9, 76; Henry v Canada (Citizenship and ......
  • Okbet v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 25, 2021
    ...the RPD not capable of supporting a positive determination of her claim on its own, see Douillard v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 390 [LeBlanc J, as he was then] at para 17. [53] See also Rahaman v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2002 FCA 89 [Evans JA] at p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT