Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc,
| Judge | Schutz,Slatter,Watson |
| Citation | 2022 ABCA 25 |
| Date | 21 January 2022 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Docket Number | 2103-0005AC |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
18 practice notes
-
Serinus Energy Plc v SysGen Solutions Group Ltd,
...that framing a precise definition of universal application is almost impossible: Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc, 2022 ABCA 25 at para 30, citing Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Co (Nos 4 and 5), [2002] UKHL 19 at para 39, [2002] 2 AC 181 The Court of Appeal has c......
-
H2 Canmore Apartments LP v Cormode & Dickson Construction Edmonton Ltd,
...but related concept from piercing the corporate veil and it is an error to conflate them: Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc, 2022 ABCA 25 at paras 48-49; Parks v McAvoy, 2023 ABCA 211 at para 51 [ Parks CA]; Swanby v Tru-Square Homes Ltd, 2023 ABCA 224 at para 42, leave to app......
-
Larsen v Allam Farms Partnership,
...the Court's discretion whether or not to draw an adverse inference: ibid at para 88; Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc, 2022 ABCA 25 at para 56 In my view, the Defendants did not identify any material point that Paul Larsen could have spoken to at trial. Additionally, they wer......
-
1010805 Alberta Ltd v Sundial Growers Inc.,
...52 The Arbitrator reviewed the leading caselaw on piercing the corporate veil, including Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc, 2022 ABCA 25 [ Driving Force] and Yaiguaje v Chevron Corporation, 20187 ONCA 472. The Arbitrator determined that this meant that corporate separateness i......
Get Started for Free
17 cases
-
Serinus Energy Plc v SysGen Solutions Group Ltd,
...that framing a precise definition of universal application is almost impossible: Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc, 2022 ABCA 25 at para 30, citing Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Co (Nos 4 and 5), [2002] UKHL 19 at para 39, [2002] 2 AC 181 The Court of Appeal has c......
-
H2 Canmore Apartments LP v Cormode & Dickson Construction Edmonton Ltd,
...but related concept from piercing the corporate veil and it is an error to conflate them: Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc, 2022 ABCA 25 at paras 48-49; Parks v McAvoy, 2023 ABCA 211 at para 51 [ Parks CA]; Swanby v Tru-Square Homes Ltd, 2023 ABCA 224 at para 42, leave to app......
-
Larsen v Allam Farms Partnership,
...the Court's discretion whether or not to draw an adverse inference: ibid at para 88; Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc, 2022 ABCA 25 at para 56 In my view, the Defendants did not identify any material point that Paul Larsen could have spoken to at trial. Additionally, they wer......
-
1010805 Alberta Ltd v Sundial Growers Inc.,
...52 The Arbitrator reviewed the leading caselaw on piercing the corporate veil, including Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc, 2022 ABCA 25 [ Driving Force] and Yaiguaje v Chevron Corporation, 20187 ONCA 472. The Arbitrator determined that this meant that corporate separateness i......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Just When I Thought I Was Out' | Parks V McAvoy
...an individual duty owed in tort". This was previously addressed by the Court of Appeal in Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc, 2022 ABCA 25: This engages two separate but overlapping concepts. There are some occasions where the law will "lift the corporate veil", and find the di......