Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc,
| Judge | Schutz,Slatter,Watson |
| Citation | 2022 ABCA 25 |
| Date | 21 January 2022 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Docket Number | 2103-0005AC |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
23 practice notes
-
Serinus Energy Plc v SysGen Solutions Group Ltd,
...that framing a precise definition of universal application is almost impossible: Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc, 2022 ABCA 25 at para 30, citing Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Co (Nos 4 and 5), [2002] UKHL 19 at para 39, [2002] 2 AC 181 The Court of Appeal has c......
-
H2 Canmore Apartments LP v Cormode & Dickson Construction Edmonton Ltd,
...but related concept from piercing the corporate veil and it is an error to conflate them: Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc, 2022 ABCA 25 at paras 48-49; Parks v McAvoy, 2023 ABCA 211 at para 51 [ Parks CA]; Swanby v Tru-Square Homes Ltd, 2023 ABCA 224 at para 42, leave to app......
-
Kuipers v NEP Ltd GP Inc.,
...the tort of conversion, but held that there must be a “wrongful act” or “unlawful act”: Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc, 2022 ABCA 25 at paras 29–33. The Court of Appeal referred to 373409 Alberta Ltd. (Receiver of) v Bank of Montreal, 2002 SCC 81, at para 9, for an explanat......
-
Distinct Real Estate USA 2 v Wazonek,,
...2019 ABCA 98 at para 18; Hogarth v Rocky Mountain Slate Inc, 2013 ABCA 57 at para 107; Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc, 2022 ABCA 25 at paras 48–49; Parks v McAvoy, 2023 ABCA 211; Swanby v Tru-Square Homes Ltd, 2023 ABCA 224 at para 42; H2 Canmore Apartments LP v Cormode &am......
Get Started for Free
24 cases
-
Serinus Energy Plc v SysGen Solutions Group Ltd,
...that framing a precise definition of universal application is almost impossible: Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc, 2022 ABCA 25 at para 30, citing Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Co (Nos 4 and 5), [2002] UKHL 19 at para 39, [2002] 2 AC 181 The Court of Appeal has c......
-
H2 Canmore Apartments LP v Cormode & Dickson Construction Edmonton Ltd,
...but related concept from piercing the corporate veil and it is an error to conflate them: Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc, 2022 ABCA 25 at paras 48-49; Parks v McAvoy, 2023 ABCA 211 at para 51 [ Parks CA]; Swanby v Tru-Square Homes Ltd, 2023 ABCA 224 at para 42, leave to app......
-
Piikani Nation v Raymond James Ltd,
...but related concept from piercing the corporate veil and it is an error to conflate them: Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc, 2022 ABCA 25 at paras 48–49; Parks v McAvoy, 2023 ABCA 211 at para 51[ Parks CA]; Swanby v Tru-Square Homes Ltd, 2023 ABCA 224 at para 42, leave to appe......
-
Kuipers v NEP Ltd GP Inc.,
...the tort of conversion, but held that there must be a “wrongful act” or “unlawful act”: Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc, 2022 ABCA 25 at paras 29–33. The Court of Appeal referred to 373409 Alberta Ltd. (Receiver of) v Bank of Montreal, 2002 SCC 81, at para 9, for an explanat......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Just When I Thought I Was Out' | Parks V McAvoy
...an individual duty owed in tort". This was previously addressed by the Court of Appeal in Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc, 2022 ABCA 25: This engages two separate but overlapping concepts. There are some occasions where the law will "lift the corporate veil", and find the di......