Drodge v. Kozak et al., [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1316
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Dardi, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | TORTS,DAMAGE AWARDS,DAMAGES |
| Citation | [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1316,[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1316 (SC),2011 BCSC 1316 |
| Date | 05 October 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
37 practice notes
-
Gabor v. Boilard, [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1724 (SC)
..., 2005 BCCA 56 at paras. 39-43. The process is one of assessment and is not amenable to mathematical precision: Drodge v. Kozak , 2011 BCSC 1316. [561] In Stapley v. Hejslet , 2006 BCCA 34 [ Stapley ] at para. 46, Kirkpatrick J.A. set out a non-exhaustive list of factors to be considered in......
-
Aselstyne v. Stobbart,
...Trites v. Penner, 2010 BCSC 882 at paras. 188-189. The process is one of assessment rather than mathematical precision: Drodge v. Kozak, 2011 BCSC 1316. [226] The Court of Appeal outlined the non-exhaustive list of factors to be considered when assessing non-pecuniary damages in Stapley v. ......
-
Midgley v. Nguyen, [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 693 (SC)
...principles govern the two questions: T.W.N.A. v. Canada (Ministry of Indian Affairs), 2003 BCCA 670 at para. 16; Drodge v. Kozak, 2011 BCSC 1316 at para. 79; Moore v. Kyba, 2012 BCCA 361 at paras. 35-36. I will return to the principles which govern the assessment of damages later in these r......
-
Munoz v. Singh, [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 567 (SC)
...v. Montgomery , 2005 BCCA 56 at 25. The process is one of assessment and is not amenable to mathematical precision: Drodge v. Kozak , 2011 BCSC 1316; Trites v. Penner , 2010 BCSC 882; Lindal . [158] In Stapley v. Hejslet , 2006 BCCA 34 at para. 46, Kirkpatrick J.A. set out a non-exhaustive ......
Request a trial to view additional results
37 cases
-
Gabor v. Boilard, [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1724 (SC)
..., 2005 BCCA 56 at paras. 39-43. The process is one of assessment and is not amenable to mathematical precision: Drodge v. Kozak , 2011 BCSC 1316. [561] In Stapley v. Hejslet , 2006 BCCA 34 [ Stapley ] at para. 46, Kirkpatrick J.A. set out a non-exhaustive list of factors to be considered in......
-
Aselstyne v. Stobbart, 2021 BCSC 26
...Trites v. Penner, 2010 BCSC 882 at paras. 188-189. The process is one of assessment rather than mathematical precision: Drodge v. Kozak, 2011 BCSC 1316. [226] The Court of Appeal outlined the non-exhaustive list of factors to be considered when assessing non-pecuniary damages in Stapley v. ......
-
Midgley v. Nguyen, [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 693 (SC)
...principles govern the two questions: T.W.N.A. v. Canada (Ministry of Indian Affairs), 2003 BCCA 670 at para. 16; Drodge v. Kozak, 2011 BCSC 1316 at para. 79; Moore v. Kyba, 2012 BCCA 361 at paras. 35-36. I will return to the principles which govern the assessment of damages later in these r......
-
Munoz v. Singh, [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 567 (SC)
...v. Montgomery , 2005 BCCA 56 at 25. The process is one of assessment and is not amenable to mathematical precision: Drodge v. Kozak , 2011 BCSC 1316; Trites v. Penner , 2010 BCSC 882; Lindal . [158] In Stapley v. Hejslet , 2006 BCCA 34 at para. 46, Kirkpatrick J.A. set out a non-exhaustive ......
Request a trial to view additional results