Dugré v. Canada (Attorney General)
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Canada) |
| Citation | 2021 FCA 8 |
| Date | 20 January 2021 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
100 practice notes
-
Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) et al. v. The Canadian Council for Refugees et al.
...The Federal Courts have additional tools under the plenary powers they possess as courts: see Dugré v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 8 at para. 20 and cases cited therein. [108] The primary tool available to parties is to request that the administrative decision-maker produce its......
-
Rodas Tejeda v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...those circumstances as comparable to those that can justify the issuance of a writ of prohibition (Dugré v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 8 at para 36). As explained in Wilson v Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, 2015 FCA 17 at paragraph 33 (rev’d on other grounds 2016 SCC 29), the value......
-
Purolator Canada Inc. v. Canada Council of Teamsters et al.
...comes after a decision on the merits: Herbert v Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FCA 11;  Dugré v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 8; Awada v Allstate, 2021 ONSC 8108; Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 Cooney Bulk Sales Limited v Teamsters ......
-
Mobile Telesystems Public Joint Stock Company v. Canada (Attorney General)
...process allows the issues to be raised and an effective remedy to be granted”. [40] More recently, in Dugré v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 8 (“Dugré”), the Federal Court of Appeal stated the following after quoting from C.B. [35] As it is clear from the above passage, an application ......
Get Started for Free
75 cases
-
Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) et al. v. The Canadian Council for Refugees et al.
...31-34. The Federal Courts have additional tools under the plenary powers they possess as courts: see Dugré v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 8 at para. 20 and cases cited therein. [108] The primary tool available to parties is to request that the administrative decision-maker produce i......
-
Purolator Canada Inc. v. Canada Council of Teamsters et al.
...judicial review comes after a decision on the merits: Herbert v Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FCA 11; Dugré v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 8; Awada v Allstate, 2021 ONSC 8108; Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 Cooney Bulk Sales Limited v Teams......
-
Rodas Tejeda v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...those circumstances as comparable to those that can justify the issuance of a writ of prohibition (Dugré v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 8 at para 36). As explained in Wilson v Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, 2015 FCA 17 at paragraph 33 (rev’d on other grounds 2016 SCC 29), the value......
-
Mobile Telesystems Public Joint Stock Company v. Canada (Attorney General)
...process allows the issues to be raised and an effective remedy to be granted”. [40] More recently, in Dugré v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 8 (“Dugré”), the Federal Court of Appeal stated the following after quoting from C.B. [35] As it is clear from the above passage, an application ......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Federal Court Of Appeal Confirms MEG Energy Does Not Infringe An Invalid Patent
...société par actions simplifiée, 2013 FCA 219 at para. 104, reconsideration refused, 2013 FCA 261; Dugré v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 8 at para. 9. Apotex Inc. v. Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc., 2008 SCC 61 at paras. 23-26. 10. Swist at para. 55. 11. Swist at para. 69. 12. Swist at ......
