Dunford v. Dunford, 2016 MBQB 196
| Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
| Judge | Thomson, J. |
| Citation | 2016 MBQB 196 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS,PRACTICE |
| Date | 11 October 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Dunford v Birnboim, 2017 MBCA 100
...J. E. Dunford ) ELLIOT BIRNBOIM ) Appeal heard and ) Decision pronounced: Appellant ) October 17, 2017 On appeal from Dunford v Dunford, 2016 MBQB 196 CHARTIER CJM (for the Court): [1] This case highlights everything that is wrong with our family law court system: an adversarial system, whe......
-
Dunford v Dunford, 2017 MBCA 35
...In written reasons issued in October 2016 (see Dunford v Dunford, 2016 MBQB 196), the motion judge was of the view that an order of costs against the appellant personally was required as he had “failed to discharge his duties to the court, and he has caused costs to be incurred witho......
-
Dunford v Dunford,
...led to him retaining counsel who appeared to make further submissions. In written reasons issued in October 2016 (see Dunford v Dunford, 2016 MBQB 196), the motion judge was of the view that an order of costs against personally was required as he had “failed to discharge his duties to the c......
3 cases
-
Dunford v Birnboim, 2017 MBCA 100
...J. E. Dunford ) ELLIOT BIRNBOIM ) Appeal heard and ) Decision pronounced: Appellant ) October 17, 2017 On appeal from Dunford v Dunford, 2016 MBQB 196 CHARTIER CJM (for the Court): [1] This case highlights everything that is wrong with our family law court system: an adversarial system, whe......
-
Dunford v Dunford, 2017 MBCA 35
...In written reasons issued in October 2016 (see Dunford v Dunford, 2016 MBQB 196), the motion judge was of the view that an order of costs against the appellant personally was required as he had “failed to discharge his duties to the court, and he has caused costs to be incurred witho......
-
Dunford v Dunford,
...led to him retaining counsel who appeared to make further submissions. In written reasons issued in October 2016 (see Dunford v Dunford, 2016 MBQB 196), the motion judge was of the view that an order of costs against personally was required as he had “failed to discharge his duties to the c......