Dysart (Township) et al. v. Mohammed

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeGillese, Hourigan and Pardu, JJ.A.
Citation[2016] O.A.C. Uned. 153 (CA),2016 ONCA 153,[2016] O.A.C. Uned. 153
Date25 February 2016
Subject MatterCOURTS,ESTOPPEL,PRACTICE,LIMITATION OF ACTIONS

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 practice notes
  • Reid v. Fortune
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • January 7, 2020
    ...court’s discretion to change support is to be exercised judicially. See: DiFrancesco v. Couto, 2001 O.J. No 4307 (OCA); Gray v. Rizzi, 2016 ONCA 153. [20] Section 1 of the guidelines sets out the objectives of the guidelines as (a) to establish a fair standard of support for children that e......
  • Mohammed v. Dysart (Municipality)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    • June 27, 2022
    ...of the Court of Appeal: Dysart, Dudley, Harcourt, Guilford, Harburn, Bruton, Havelock, Eyre and Clyde (United Townships) v. Mohammed, 2016 ONCA 153, and his application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was also dismissed: Jameel Hosein Mohammed also known as Adolphus Cecil......
  • Lynch v. Lewis
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • January 3, 2020
    ...discretion to reduce support arrears is to be exercised judicially. See: DiFrancesco v. Couto, 2001 O.J. No 4307 (OCA); Gray v. Rizzi, 2016 ONCA 153. [18] Section 19 of the guidelines permits the court to impute income to a party if it finds that the party is earning or is capable of earnin......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 22-26, 2016)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 7, 2016
    ...Outerbridge Management Ltd. Dysart, Dudley, Harcourt, Guilford, Harburn, Bruton, Havelock, Eyre and Clyde (United Townships) v. Mohammed, 2016 ONCA 153 Keywords: Vexatious Litigant, s. 140(1) Courts of Justice Act, Motion for Extension of Time to File Appeal, Res Judicata, Abuse of Process ......
3 cases
  • Reid v. Fortune
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • January 7, 2020
    ...court’s discretion to change support is to be exercised judicially. See: DiFrancesco v. Couto, 2001 O.J. No 4307 (OCA); Gray v. Rizzi, 2016 ONCA 153. [20] Section 1 of the guidelines sets out the objectives of the guidelines as (a) to establish a fair standard of support for children that e......
  • Lynch v. Lewis
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • January 3, 2020
    ...discretion to reduce support arrears is to be exercised judicially. See: DiFrancesco v. Couto, 2001 O.J. No 4307 (OCA); Gray v. Rizzi, 2016 ONCA 153. [18] Section 19 of the guidelines permits the court to impute income to a party if it finds that the party is earning or is capable of earnin......
  • Mohammed v. Dysart (Municipality)
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 27, 2022
    ...of the Court of Appeal: Dysart, Dudley, Harcourt, Guilford, Harburn, Bruton, Havelock, Eyre and Clyde (United Townships) v. Mohammed, 2016 ONCA 153, and his application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was also dismissed: Jameel Hosein Mohammed also known as Adolphus Cecil......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 22-26, 2016)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 7, 2016
    ...Outerbridge Management Ltd. Dysart, Dudley, Harcourt, Guilford, Harburn, Bruton, Havelock, Eyre and Clyde (United Townships) v. Mohammed, 2016 ONCA 153 Keywords: Vexatious Litigant, s. 140(1) Courts of Justice Act, Motion for Extension of Time to File Appeal, Res Judicata, Abuse of Process ......