Eaglestone v. Intact Insurance,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Kent |
| Citation | 2022 BCSC 2007 |
| Docket Number | S17840; S17808 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Date | 17 November 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
2023 BCSC 323,
...description of this process without legal citations for the benefit of a self-represented litigant in Eaglestone v. Intact Insurance, 2022 BCSC 2007 at para. 17. It is perhaps worth repeating here: [14] The primary role of a trial judge is to make findings of fact, i.e. to determine what ha......
-
2023 BCSC 184,
...description of this process without legal citations for the benefit of a self-represented litigant in Eaglestone v. Intact Insurance, 2022 BCSC 2007 at para. 17. It is perhaps worth repeating here: [14] The primary role of a trial judge is to make findings of fact, i.e. to determine what ha......
-
Sandu v Sandu,
...description of this process without legal citations for the benefit of a self-represented litigant in Eaglestone v. Intact Insurance, 2022 BCSC 2007 at para. 17. It is perhaps worth repeating here: [14] The primary role of a trial judge is to make findings of fact, i.e. to determine what ha......
-
Phoenix Homes Ltd v Takhar,
...description of this process without legal citations for the benefit of a self-represented litigant in Eaglestone v. Intact Insurance, 2022 BCSC 2007 at para. 17. It is perhaps worth repeating here: [14] The primary role of a trial judge is to make findings of fact, i.e. to determine what ha......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
2023 BCSC 323,
...description of this process without legal citations for the benefit of a self-represented litigant in Eaglestone v. Intact Insurance, 2022 BCSC 2007 at para. 17. It is perhaps worth repeating here: [14] The primary role of a trial judge is to make findings of fact, i.e. to determine what ha......
-
2023 BCSC 184,
...description of this process without legal citations for the benefit of a self-represented litigant in Eaglestone v. Intact Insurance, 2022 BCSC 2007 at para. 17. It is perhaps worth repeating here: [14] The primary role of a trial judge is to make findings of fact, i.e. to determine what ha......
-
Sandu v Sandu,
...description of this process without legal citations for the benefit of a self-represented litigant in Eaglestone v. Intact Insurance, 2022 BCSC 2007 at para. 17. It is perhaps worth repeating here: [14] The primary role of a trial judge is to make findings of fact, i.e. to determine what ha......
-
Phoenix Homes Ltd v Takhar,
...description of this process without legal citations for the benefit of a self-represented litigant in Eaglestone v. Intact Insurance, 2022 BCSC 2007 at para. 17. It is perhaps worth repeating here: [14] The primary role of a trial judge is to make findings of fact, i.e. to determine what ha......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Unraveling The Aftermath Of A Property Loss Claim | Eaglestone V. Intact Insurance, 2022 BCSC 2007
...the reasons behind the decision to ensure it has complied with its duty of good faith and fairness. Case: Eaglestone v. Intact Insurance, 2022 BCSC 2007 * * Brownlee LLP is a member of the Canadian Litigation Counsel, a nationwide affiliation of independent law firms . The content of this a......