Eastern Platinum Limited v. Cameron, 2020 BCSC 1353
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice M. Taylor |
Citation | 2020 BCSC 1353 |
Date | 17 August 2020 |
Docket Number | S186503 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
2023 BCSC 952,
...v. Fitzgerald, 2005 BCCA 48 at para. 13; Nilsson Bros. Inc. at paras. 6–8. 73 The court in Eastern Platinum Limited v Cameron, 2020 BCSC 1353 summarized the proper approach to the question of prejudice as follows: [85] The Court of Appeal has stated that an amendment must not be refu......
-
Santos v Turgeon,
...v. Fitzgerald, 2005 BCCA 48 at para. 13; Nilsson Bros. Inc. at paras. 6–8. 73 The court in Eastern Platinum Limited v Cameron, 2020 BCSC 1353 summarized the proper approach to the question of prejudice as follows: [85] The Court of Appeal has stated that an amendment must not be refu......
-
2023 BCSC 208,
...to allow a pleadings amendment when a limitation issue may exist was summarized by Justice Taylor in Eastern Platinum Limited v. Cameron, 2020 BCSC 1353: [37] With respect to the issue of a potentially expiring limitation period on an application to amend pleadings, the first question to be......
-
Pan v. Kelly,
...to allow a pleadings amendment when a limitation issue may exist was summarized by Justice Taylor in Eastern Platinum Limited v. Cameron, 2020 BCSC 1353: [37] With respect to the issue of a potentially expiring limitation period on an application to amend plead......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
2023 BCSC 952,
...v. Fitzgerald, 2005 BCCA 48 at para. 13; Nilsson Bros. Inc. at paras. 6–8. 73 The court in Eastern Platinum Limited v Cameron, 2020 BCSC 1353 summarized the proper approach to the question of prejudice as follows: [85] The Court of Appeal has stated that an amendment must not be refu......
-
Santos v Turgeon,
...v. Fitzgerald, 2005 BCCA 48 at para. 13; Nilsson Bros. Inc. at paras. 6–8. 73 The court in Eastern Platinum Limited v Cameron, 2020 BCSC 1353 summarized the proper approach to the question of prejudice as follows: [85] The Court of Appeal has stated that an amendment must not be refu......
-
2023 BCSC 208,
...to allow a pleadings amendment when a limitation issue may exist was summarized by Justice Taylor in Eastern Platinum Limited v. Cameron, 2020 BCSC 1353: [37] With respect to the issue of a potentially expiring limitation period on an application to amend pleadings, the first question to be......
-
Pan v. Kelly,
...to allow a pleadings amendment when a limitation issue may exist was summarized by Justice Taylor in Eastern Platinum Limited v. Cameron, 2020 BCSC 1353: [37] With respect to the issue of a potentially expiring limitation period on an application to amend plead......
Request a trial to view additional results