Edmonton (City) v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546

JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice Douglas R. Mah
Citation2020 ABQB 546
Docket Number2003 09491
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Date17 September 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Mbh v Cki,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 15, 2023
    ...on an affidavit does not come into play here: Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff, 2022 ABQB 188 at para 25(h); Edmonton v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546 at para 17; Rieger v Plains Midstream Canada ULC, 2019 ABQB 666 at para 7; Dow Chemical Canada Inc v Shell Chemicals Canada Ltd, 2008 ABQB 671 at para......
  • Metis Nation of Alberta Association Local Council #63 v Alberta (Corporate Registry),
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 10, 2021
    ...to the application before the court: Dow Chemical Canada Inc v Shell Chemicals Canada Ltd, 2008 ABQB 671 at para 5 and Edmonton v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546 at para [25]        All of the sought-after undertakings appear to me to be aimed at determining whether......
  • Baffinland Iron Mines v Inuavak et al,
    • Canada
    • Nunavut Court of Justice (Canada)
    • April 20, 2021
    ...to refusals in the context of cross-examination in Mallon v Norman Wells, 2021 NWTSC 14 at para 41, citing Edmonton (City) v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546 and Alberta Treasury Branches v Leahy, 1999 ABQB 1. Cross-examination on affidavit is not a discovery. Discovery has a broader purpose and scope......
  • BH-BC Holdings Ltd v Regent Holdings UCL,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 15, 2021
    ...[4]           Mr. Justice Mah applied a similar approach in Edmonton (City) v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546. at paragraph Drawing these authorities together, I summarize the applicable principles as follows: 1.      The scop......
4 cases
  • Mbh v Cki,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 15, 2023
    ...on an affidavit does not come into play here: Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff, 2022 ABQB 188 at para 25(h); Edmonton v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546 at para 17; Rieger v Plains Midstream Canada ULC, 2019 ABQB 666 at para 7; Dow Chemical Canada Inc v Shell Chemicals Canada Ltd, 2008 ABQB 671 at para......
  • Metis Nation of Alberta Association Local Council #63 v Alberta (Corporate Registry),
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 10, 2021
    ...to the application before the court: Dow Chemical Canada Inc v Shell Chemicals Canada Ltd, 2008 ABQB 671 at para 5 and Edmonton v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546 at para [25]        All of the sought-after undertakings appear to me to be aimed at determining whether......
  • Baffinland Iron Mines v Inuavak et al,
    • Canada
    • Nunavut Court of Justice (Canada)
    • April 20, 2021
    ...to refusals in the context of cross-examination in Mallon v Norman Wells, 2021 NWTSC 14 at para 41, citing Edmonton (City) v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546 and Alberta Treasury Branches v Leahy, 1999 ABQB 1. Cross-examination on affidavit is not a discovery. Discovery has a broader purpose and scope......
  • BH-BC Holdings Ltd v Regent Holdings UCL,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 15, 2021
    ...[4]           Mr. Justice Mah applied a similar approach in Edmonton (City) v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546. at paragraph Drawing these authorities together, I summarize the applicable principles as follows: 1.      The scop......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT