Edwards v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2017 BCSC 582
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice G.R.J. Gaul |
| Citation | 2017 BCSC 582 |
| Docket Number | S142196 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Date | 07 April 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Rabbani v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2018 BCSC 445
...this court that have considered the matter of procedural fairness: Edwards v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2017 BCSC 582 and Cannon v. Worker's Compensation Appeal Tribunal (26 November 2010), Vancouver S092291 (B.C.S.C. [104] In Cannon, Baker J. concluded WCAT’......
-
Atkins v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2018 BCSC 1178
...be set aside on a showing that it was patently unreasonable. [20] In Edwards v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2017 BCSC 582, Gaul J. summarised the jurisprudence governing the applicable standard of review in cases such as this as [48] There is a healthy body of ......
-
Pickering v. School District No. 38 (Richmond),
...as long as there is some evidence. The employer cites Edwards v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2017 BCSC 582: [67] The law is clear that significant deference must be given to the assessment of evidence and the findings of fact that are w......
3 cases
-
Rabbani v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2018 BCSC 445
...this court that have considered the matter of procedural fairness: Edwards v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2017 BCSC 582 and Cannon v. Worker's Compensation Appeal Tribunal (26 November 2010), Vancouver S092291 (B.C.S.C. [104] In Cannon, Baker J. concluded WCAT’......
-
Atkins v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2018 BCSC 1178
...be set aside on a showing that it was patently unreasonable. [20] In Edwards v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2017 BCSC 582, Gaul J. summarised the jurisprudence governing the applicable standard of review in cases such as this as [48] There is a healthy body of ......
-
Pickering v. School District No. 38 (Richmond),
...as long as there is some evidence. The employer cites Edwards v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2017 BCSC 582: [67] The law is clear that significant deference must be given to the assessment of evidence and the findings of fact that are w......