Elangovan v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 882
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FC 882 |
| Date | 04 September 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Thorne v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 364
...come before this Court are: Courtemanche v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 649 [Courtemanche]; Elangovan v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 882 [Elangovan]; Al Nahawi v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 1085; Haddad v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 235 [Haddad]; Lipskaia v Canada ......
-
T.C.S.T. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 473
...on individual’s mobility rights under s. 6 of the Charter is reasonable under s. 1 of the Charter (Elangovan v Canada (AG), 2020 FC 882; Almrei v Canada (MCI), 2007 FC 1025 ); see also Doré v Barreau du Québec, 2012 SCC 12 [13] However, despite the Applicant’s sen......
-
Singh v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 302
...the style of cause shall be amended to name the Attorney General of Canada as the Respondent (Elangovan v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 882 at para 4 [Elangovan]; Villamil v Canada (Attorney General), 2013 FC 686 at para 2). [18] The Applicant and the Respondent have both included docu......
2 cases
-
Thorne v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 364
...come before this Court are: Courtemanche v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 649 [Courtemanche]; Elangovan v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 882 [Elangovan]; Al Nahawi v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 1085; Haddad v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 235 [Haddad]; Lipskaia v Canada ......
-
Singh v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 302
...the style of cause shall be amended to name the Attorney General of Canada as the Respondent (Elangovan v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 882 at para 4 [Elangovan]; Villamil v Canada (Attorney General), 2013 FC 686 at para 2). [18] The Applicant and the Respondent have both included docu......