Enge v. Canada (Indigenous and Northern Affairs), 2017 FC 932

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2017 FC 932
Date19 October 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 14 ' 18, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 29, 2023
    ...43, Rodaro v Royal Bank of Canada, (2002), 59 O.R. (3d) 74, North Slave Métis Alliance v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development), 2017 FC 932, Behn v Moulton Contracting Ltd., 2013 SCC 23, Chilian v Augdome Corp. (1991), 2 O.R. (3d) 696, Lax Kw'alaams Indian Band v Canadian (Attorn......
  • Joyce v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • January 27, 2022
    ...it was a breach of the duty to consult, if only one of those groups was consulted - Enge v. Mandeville, 2013 NWTSC 33 and Enge v. Canada, 2017 FC 932. [113]   Ultimately, as in the case at Bar, each case must be determined on its own unique circumstances. It is important to recall......
  • Metis Settlements General Council v. Canada (Crown-Indigenous Relations), 2024 FC 487
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 28, 2024
    ...K’e]; Huron-Wendat Nation of Wendake v Canada, 2014 FC 1154 [Huron-Wendat]; Enge v Canada (Indigenous and Northern Affairs), 2017 FC 932 [Enge]. Over the last 50 years, the consistent practice has been that such agreements are implemented by legislation. This did not stop this Court ......
  • Watson v. Canada, 2020 FC 129
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 28, 2020
    ...better allow for a process for the assertion of collective Aboriginal and Treaty rights (Enge v Canada (Indigenous and Northern Affairs, 2017 FC 932 at paras 95-96, 284 ACWS (3d) 480): 114 (1) Despite rule 302, a proceeding, other than a proceeding referred to in section 27 or 28 of the Act......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • Joyce v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • January 27, 2022
    ...it was a breach of the duty to consult, if only one of those groups was consulted - Enge v. Mandeville, 2013 NWTSC 33 and Enge v. Canada, 2017 FC 932. [113]   Ultimately, as in the case at Bar, each case must be determined on its own unique circumstances. It is important to recall......
  • Watson v. Canada, 2020 FC 129
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 28, 2020
    ...better allow for a process for the assertion of collective Aboriginal and Treaty rights (Enge v Canada (Indigenous and Northern Affairs, 2017 FC 932 at paras 95-96, 284 ACWS (3d) 480): 114 (1) Despite rule 302, a proceeding, other than a proceeding referred to in section 27 or 28 of the Act......
  • 2023 ONCA 543,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • January 1, 2023
    ...albeit unsuccessfully. 45 The second example is North Slave Métis Alliance v. Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development), 2017 FC 932, [2018] 2 C.N.L.R. 99. The claimant was a member and representative of the North Slave Métis Alliance. He asserted that the Federal Crown and......
  • Kaska Dena Council v. Yukon (Government of), 2019 YKSC 13
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Yukon
    • March 5, 2019
    ...claim for a duty to consult and accommodate. [104]    Enge v. Canada (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development), 2017 FC 932 (the “Enge case”), is a case in which the Federal Court considered whether Mr. Enge satisfied the standing requirements o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 14 ' 18, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 29, 2023
    ...43, Rodaro v Royal Bank of Canada, (2002), 59 O.R. (3d) 74, North Slave Métis Alliance v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development), 2017 FC 932, Behn v Moulton Contracting Ltd., 2013 SCC 23, Chilian v Augdome Corp. (1991), 2 O.R. (3d) 696, Lax Kw'alaams Indian Band v Canadian (Attorn......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT