Engineers Canada v. REM Chemicals Inc., [2014] F.T.R. Uned. 266 (FC)

JudgeRussell, J.
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Case DateJuly 03, 2014
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations[2014] F.T.R. Uned. 266 (FC);[2014] F.T.R. Uned. 266;2014 FC 644
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Pfizer Products Inc. v. Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association, 2015 FC 493
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 20, 2015
    ...Marketing Inc. (2009), 342 F.T.R. 224; 2009 FC 153, refd to. [para. 25]. Engineers Canada v. REM Chemicals Inc., [2014] F.T.R. Uned. 266; 2014 FC 644, refd to. [para. Mattel Inc. v. 3894207 Canada Inc. et al., [2006] 1 S.C.R. 772; 348 N.R. 340; 2006 SCC 22, refd to. [para. 27]. Labatt (John......
  • The Federal Court Finds Two Generic Company's Allegations To Be Unjustified (Intellectual Property Weekly Abstracts Bulletin – Week Of July 7, 2014)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 11, 2014
    ...its MICRO FOCUS mark. TMOB Decision Overturned – When Sounded, Mark is Deceptively Misdescriptive Engineers Canada v. REM Chemicals Inc., 2014 FC 644 In an appeal from a decision of the Trade-marks Opposition Board, the Court allowed the appeal and rejected the Respondent's application for ......
  • CWI, Inc. v. Thompson Dorfman Sweatman LLT, 2018 FC 941
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 26, 2018
    ...Applicant submits the alleged error would make the decision unreasonable: Canadian Council of Professional Engineers v REM Chemicals Inc, 2014 FC 644 at paras 22–23, 27, 58, 125 CPR (4th) 245. [19] As I will discuss below, I do not find that the Registrar erred in applying the test for devi......
  • CEDC International SP. Z O.O v. Underberg KG and Underberg AG, 2016 FC 1172
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 20, 2016
    ...of the evidence. On appeal such matters must be examined on the standard of reasonableness: see Engineers Canada v Rem Chemicals, Inc, 2014 FC 644 at para 28, 125 CPR (4th) 245. In cases like this where the parties have tendered new evidence in support of their positions in accordance with ......
3 cases
  • Pfizer Products Inc. v. Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association, 2015 FC 493
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 20, 2015
    ...Marketing Inc. (2009), 342 F.T.R. 224; 2009 FC 153, refd to. [para. 25]. Engineers Canada v. REM Chemicals Inc., [2014] F.T.R. Uned. 266; 2014 FC 644, refd to. [para. Mattel Inc. v. 3894207 Canada Inc. et al., [2006] 1 S.C.R. 772; 348 N.R. 340; 2006 SCC 22, refd to. [para. 27]. Labatt (John......
  • CWI, Inc. v. Thompson Dorfman Sweatman LLT, 2018 FC 941
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 26, 2018
    ...Applicant submits the alleged error would make the decision unreasonable: Canadian Council of Professional Engineers v REM Chemicals Inc, 2014 FC 644 at paras 22–23, 27, 58, 125 CPR (4th) 245. [19] As I will discuss below, I do not find that the Registrar erred in applying the test for devi......
  • CEDC International SP. Z O.O v. Underberg KG and Underberg AG, 2016 FC 1172
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 20, 2016
    ...of the evidence. On appeal such matters must be examined on the standard of reasonableness: see Engineers Canada v Rem Chemicals, Inc, 2014 FC 644 at para 28, 125 CPR (4th) 245. In cases like this where the parties have tendered new evidence in support of their positions in accordance with ......
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT