English v. Richmond (City),
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Frankel,The Honourable Mr. Justice Fitch,The Honourable Madam Justice DeWitt-Van Oosten |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 BCCA 442 |
| Date | 24 November 2021 |
| Citation | 2021 BCCA 442 |
| Docket Number | CA47143 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
2023 BCSC 73,
...is inevitable, and no useful purpose would be served by remitting them back to City to reconsider. 258 In English v. Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442 [ English] at paras. 123–139, the Court of Appeal considered whether the chambers judge had erred in ordering mandamus, and decided that......
-
Hammer Head Equities Inc. v Rossland (City),
...is inevitable, and no useful purpose would be served by remitting them back to City to reconsider. 258 In English v. Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442 [ English] at paras. 123–139, the Court of Appeal considered whether the chambers judge had erred in ordering mandamus, and decided that......
-
Fipke v Kelowna (City),
...2019 SCC 65 [ Vavilov], the standard of review of the City's Decision is reasonableness; see also English v. Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442 [ English] at paras. 57–59. The chambers judge correctly identified this standard of 51 In Vavilov, the Court identified two types of funda......
3 cases
-
2023 BCSC 73,
...is inevitable, and no useful purpose would be served by remitting them back to City to reconsider. 258 In English v. Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442 [ English] at paras. 123–139, the Court of Appeal considered whether the chambers judge had erred in ordering mandamus, and decided that......
-
Fipke v Kelowna (City),
...2019 SCC 65 [ Vavilov], the standard of review of the City's Decision is reasonableness; see also English v. Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442 [ English] at paras. 57–59. The chambers judge correctly identified this standard of 51 In Vavilov, the Court identified two types of funda......
-
Hammer Head Equities Inc. v Rossland (City),
...is inevitable, and no useful purpose would be served by remitting them back to City to reconsider. 258 In English v. Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442 [ English] at paras. 123–139, the Court of Appeal considered whether the chambers judge had erred in ordering mandamus, and decided that......