English v. Richmond (City),

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Frankel,The Honourable Mr. Justice Fitch,The Honourable Madam Justice DeWitt-Van Oosten
Neutral Citation2021 BCCA 442
Date24 November 2021
Citation2021 BCCA 442
Docket NumberCA47143
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • 2023 BCSC 73,
    • Canada
    • 1 d0 Janeiro d0 2023
    ...is inevitable, and no useful purpose would be served by remitting them back to City to reconsider. 258 In English v. Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442 [ English] at paras. 123–139, the Court of Appeal considered whether the chambers judge had erred in ordering mandamus, and decided that......
  • Hammer Head Equities Inc. v Rossland (City),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 16 d1 Janeiro d1 2023
    ...is inevitable, and no useful purpose would be served by remitting them back to City to reconsider. 258 In English v. Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442 [ English] at paras. 123–139, the Court of Appeal considered whether the chambers judge had erred in ordering mandamus, and decided that......
  • Fipke v Kelowna (City),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 19 d4 Janeiro d4 2023
    ...2019 SCC 65 [ Vavilov], the standard of review of the City's Decision is reasonableness; see also English v. Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442 [ English] at paras. 57–59. The chambers judge correctly identified this standard of 51 In Vavilov, the Court identified two types of funda......
3 cases
  • 2023 BCSC 73,
    • Canada
    • 1 d0 Janeiro d0 2023
    ...is inevitable, and no useful purpose would be served by remitting them back to City to reconsider. 258 In English v. Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442 [ English] at paras. 123–139, the Court of Appeal considered whether the chambers judge had erred in ordering mandamus, and decided that......
  • Fipke v Kelowna (City),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 19 d4 Janeiro d4 2023
    ...2019 SCC 65 [ Vavilov], the standard of review of the City's Decision is reasonableness; see also English v. Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442 [ English] at paras. 57–59. The chambers judge correctly identified this standard of 51 In Vavilov, the Court identified two types of funda......
  • Hammer Head Equities Inc. v Rossland (City),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 16 d1 Janeiro d1 2023
    ...is inevitable, and no useful purpose would be served by remitting them back to City to reconsider. 258 In English v. Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442 [ English] at paras. 123–139, the Court of Appeal considered whether the chambers judge had erred in ordering mandamus, and decided that......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT