English v. Richmond (City)
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Frankel,The Honourable Mr. Justice Fitch,The Honourable Madam Justice DeWitt-Van Oosten |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 BCCA 442 |
| Citation | 2021 BCCA 442 |
| Date | 24 November 2021 |
| Docket Number | CA47143 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
30 practice notes
-
Beach Place Ventures Ltd. v. Employment Standards Tribunal
...Music Publishers of Canada, 2020 FCA 100 at para. 42, leave to appeal to SCC granted, 39418 (22 April 2021); English v. Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442 at para. 63. For example, in English this Court recently concluded that a decision-maker’s interpretation of a regulation was unreasonable b......
-
Hammer Head Equities Inc. v. Rossland (City)
...is inevitable, and no useful purpose would be served by remitting them back to City to reconsider. [258] In English v. Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442 [English] at paras. 123-139, the Court of Appeal considered whether the chambers judge had erred in ordering mandamus, and decided that they ......
-
Langlois v. Canada
...is presumed that the provisions of legislation are meant to work together, both logically and teleologically (English v Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442 at para 114). The applicant relies on the tense of the verbs used in the English and French versions of paragraph 5.3(1)(a) and subsections ......
-
Vanderhaeghe v. Sunshine Coast (Regional District)
...applied the reasonableness standard with respect to judicial reviews of building permit decisions: see e.g. English v. Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442 at para. 56; Yu v. Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 226 at para. [66] The reviewing court will consider “only whether the decision made by the admi......
Get Started for Free
30 cases
-
Beach Place Ventures Ltd. v. Employment Standards Tribunal
...Music Publishers of Canada, 2020 FCA 100 at para. 42, leave to appeal to SCC granted, 39418 (22 April 2021); English v. Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442 at para. 63. For example, in English this Court recently concluded that a decision-maker’s interpretation of a regulation was unreasonable b......
-
Hammer Head Equities Inc. v. Rossland (City)
...is inevitable, and no useful purpose would be served by remitting them back to City to reconsider. [258] In English v. Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442 [English] at paras. 123-139, the Court of Appeal considered whether the chambers judge had erred in ordering mandamus, and decided that they ......
-
Langlois v. Canada
...is presumed that the provisions of legislation are meant to work together, both logically and teleologically (English v Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442 at para 114). The applicant relies on the tense of the verbs used in the English and French versions of paragraph 5.3(1)(a) and subsections ......
-
Vanderhaeghe v. Sunshine Coast (Regional District)
...applied the reasonableness standard with respect to judicial reviews of building permit decisions: see e.g. English v. Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442 at para. 56; Yu v. Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 226 at para. [66] The reviewing court will consider “only whether the decision made by the admi......
Get Started for Free
