Enviro Trace Ltd. v. Sheichuk et al.

JurisdictionAlberta
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
JudgeVeit, J.
Citation[2014] A.R. Uned. 459 (QB),[2014] A.R. Uned. 459,2014 ABQB 381
Date25 June 2014
Subject MatterINJUNCTIONS

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 practice notes
  • GG & HH Inc v 2306084 Alberta Ltd
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 20, 2022
    ...include: Laser Clean Ltd (Don’s Power Vac) v Clark, 2015 ABQB 645, rev’d on other grounds, 2016 ABCA 4; Enviro Trace Ltd v Sheichuk, 2014 ABQB 381; Diversified Metal v Trivett, 2006 PESCAD 16; Canada East Manufacturing, Inc v Harvey, 1996 CanLII 4872 (NB CA). Many other examples can be foun......
  • Condominium Corporation No. 042 5177 v Kuzio
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 21, 2019
    ...perspective of a court requested to grant an interim injunction must be, as Justice Veit observed in Enviro Trace Ltd v Sheichuk, 2014 ABQB 381 at para 28, whether granting the injunction is “fair and equitable.” Further, and again as Justice Veit observed in Enviro Trace at para 28, the tr......
  • SHAC Solutions Inc v. Guenther
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 25, 2024
    ...to protect trade secrets, even in an employment context, may not attract the higher standard of proof; Enviro Trace Ltd v Sheichuk, 2014 ABQB 381 at [14] Further, the Applicant challenged the proposition that an injunction would impede the Respondents’ ability to earn income, albeit not at ......
  • EAD Property Holdings (103) Corp. v. Greyhound Canada Transportation ULC
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 13, 2015
    ...injury: Law Society of Upper Canada v MacNaughton , [1942] OWN 551 at 551, [1942] OJ No 235. [30] In Enviro Trace Ltd v Sheichuk , 2014 ABQB 381 at paras 23-25, Veit J noted that injunctions should not be granted prematurely and some cases have required that the harm be imminent. She opined......
  • Get Started for Free
9 cases
  • GG & HH Inc v 2306084 Alberta Ltd
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 20, 2022
    ...include: Laser Clean Ltd (Don’s Power Vac) v Clark, 2015 ABQB 645, rev’d on other grounds, 2016 ABCA 4; Enviro Trace Ltd v Sheichuk, 2014 ABQB 381; Diversified Metal v Trivett, 2006 PESCAD 16; Canada East Manufacturing, Inc v Harvey, 1996 CanLII 4872 (NB CA). Many other examples can be foun......
  • Condominium Corporation No. 042 5177 v Kuzio
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 21, 2019
    ...perspective of a court requested to grant an interim injunction must be, as Justice Veit observed in Enviro Trace Ltd v Sheichuk, 2014 ABQB 381 at para 28, whether granting the injunction is “fair and equitable.” Further, and again as Justice Veit observed in Enviro Trace at para 28, the tr......
  • EAD Property Holdings (103) Corp. v. Greyhound Canada Transportation ULC
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 13, 2015
    ...injury: Law Society of Upper Canada v MacNaughton , [1942] OWN 551 at 551, [1942] OJ No 235. [30] In Enviro Trace Ltd v Sheichuk , 2014 ABQB 381 at paras 23-25, Veit J noted that injunctions should not be granted prematurely and some cases have required that the harm be imminent. She opined......
  • SHAC Solutions Inc v. Guenther
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 25, 2024
    ...to protect trade secrets, even in an employment context, may not attract the higher standard of proof; Enviro Trace Ltd v Sheichuk, 2014 ABQB 381 at [14] Further, the Applicant challenged the proposition that an injunction would impede the Respondents’ ability to earn income, albeit not at ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries