Environment, competitive strategy, and organizational characteristics: A path analytic model of construction organizations’ performance in South Africa
Author | Luqman Oyekunle Oyewobi,James O. B. Rotimi,Abimbola Olukemi Windapo |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1384 |
Published date | 01 September 2016 |
Date | 01 September 2016 |
Environment, competitive strategy, and
organizational characteristics: A path analytic
model of construction organizations’performance
in South Africa
Luqman Oyekunle Oyewobi*
University of Cape Town
Abimbola Olukemi Windapo
University of Cape Town
James O. B. Rotimi
Auckland University of Technology
Abstract
While mainstream strategic management researchers have
paid attentionto the causes of performance differential among
organizations, there is a dearth of empirical research within
the construction industry on the subject.We examine the rela-
tionship betweenenvironment, organizational characteristics,
competitive strategies, and performance of construction
organizations in the South African construction industry. In
order to developa model for improving organizations’perfor-
mance, partial least squares was employed using quantitative
data collected from a sample of 72 large construction firms
listed on the Construction Industry Development Board
contractors’register in South Africa. The results reveal that
organizational characteristics have a direct influence on
organizational performance, while the relationship between
the business environment and organizational performance is
mediated by competitivestrategies. Copyright © 2016 ASAC.
Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: construction company, contingency, competitive
strategy, organizational structure, performance, South Africa
Résumé
L’intérêt des chercheurs en gestion stratégique classique
pour les causes de la différence des performances entre les
organisations contraste avec la pénurie des recherches
empiriques sur ce sujet à l ’intérieur de l’industrie de con-
struction. Dans cet article, nous examinons la relation entre
l’environnement, les caractéristiques organisationnelles, les
stratégies concurrentielles et la performance des entreprises
de construction appartenant à l’industrie sud-africaine de la
construction. Le modèle élaboré pour l’amélioration de la
performance organisationnelle s’appuie sur l’analyse
partielle par les moindres carrés effectuée à partir de
données qualitatives recueillies auprès d’un échantillon de
72 grandes firmes de construction inscrites dans le registre
des entrepreneurs du Construction Industry Development
Board en Afrique du Sud. Les résultats montrent que si les
caractéristiques organisationnelles ont un impact direct
sur la performance organisationnelle, en revanche, la rela-
tion entre l’environnement des affaires et la performance
organisationnelle est subordonnée aux stratégies
concurrentielles. Copyright © 2016 ASAC. Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Mots-clés : compagnie de construction, éventualité, stratégie
concurrentielle, structure organisationnelle, performance,
Afrique du Sud
To maintain relevance in the ever-changing and hyper-
competitive construction business environment, it is fundamen-
tal that construction organizations continuously improve their
performance (Dansoh, 2005; Phua, 2006). Their performance
hasbeenlinkedtothecharacteristics of organizations, their
adopted competitive strategy, and the business environment
in which they operate (Lenz, 1981), among others. These
Thispaper was presentedat the 2014 InternationalConference on Infrastructure
development and Investment strategies for Africa, Livingstone, Zambia. The
financial assistance of the National Research Foundation (NRF) towards this
research is hereby acknowledged. Opinions expressed or conclusions drawn
are those of the authors and are not necessarily attributed to the NRF.
*Please address correspondence to: Luqman Oyekunle Oyewobi, Doctoral
Student, Department of Construction Economics and Management,
University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7405, South Africa. Email:
oywluq001@myuct.ac.za
Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences
Revue canadienne des sciences de l’administration
33: 213–226 (2016)
Published online 24 May 2016 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/CJAS.1384
Can J Adm Sci
33(3), 213–226 (2016)Copyright © 2016 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 213
To continue reading
Request your trial