Ermineskin Indian Band v. Canada, [2008] F.T.R. Uned. 749
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Phelan, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,PRACTICE,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,INCOME TAX |
| Citation | [2008] F.T.R. Uned. 749,2008 FC 1065,[2008] F.T.R. Uned. 749 (FC) |
| Date | 23 September 2008 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Ear v. Canada, (2013) 439 F.T.R. 279 (FC)
..., affming. [1994] 1 F.C. 742 ; 162 N.R. 177 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 33]. Ermineskin Indian Band v. Canada, [2008] F.T.R. Uned. 749 ; 2008 FC 1065, refd to. [para. Canada et al. v. Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations (2003), 230 F.T.R. 29 ; 2003 FCT 306 , refd to. [para. 50]. C......
-
Lukács v. Canadian Transportation Agency, (2016) 488 N.R. 395 (FCA)
...(Attorney General), [1994] 1 F.C. 742, [1993] F.C.J. No. 1098 [Apotex]). [13] The Agency refers to Ermineskin First Nation v. Canada, 2008 FC 1065, 2008 CarswellNat 3384 to point out that the standard of reasonableness applies on the discretionary aspects of a mandamus [14] In Canadian Nati......
-
Amahoose et al. v. Kehewin Cree Nation et al., [2010] F.T.R. Uned. 598 (FC)
...the considerations that must be made in exercising such discretion in Ermineskin Indian Band and Nations v. Canada , September 23, 2008, 2008 FC 1065 at paragraph 31: On the issue of mandamus, the Court of Appeal in Apotex v. Canada (A.G.), [1994] 1 F.C. 742 (F.C.A.), held that the principl......
3 cases
-
Ear v. Canada, (2013) 439 F.T.R. 279 (FC)
..., affming. [1994] 1 F.C. 742 ; 162 N.R. 177 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 33]. Ermineskin Indian Band v. Canada, [2008] F.T.R. Uned. 749 ; 2008 FC 1065, refd to. [para. Canada et al. v. Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations (2003), 230 F.T.R. 29 ; 2003 FCT 306 , refd to. [para. 50]. C......
-
Lukács v. Canadian Transportation Agency, (2016) 488 N.R. 395 (FCA)
...(Attorney General), [1994] 1 F.C. 742, [1993] F.C.J. No. 1098 [Apotex]). [13] The Agency refers to Ermineskin First Nation v. Canada, 2008 FC 1065, 2008 CarswellNat 3384 to point out that the standard of reasonableness applies on the discretionary aspects of a mandamus [14] In Canadian Nati......
-
Amahoose et al. v. Kehewin Cree Nation et al., [2010] F.T.R. Uned. 598 (FC)
...the considerations that must be made in exercising such discretion in Ermineskin Indian Band and Nations v. Canada , September 23, 2008, 2008 FC 1065 at paragraph 31: On the issue of mandamus, the Court of Appeal in Apotex v. Canada (A.G.), [1994] 1 F.C. 742 (F.C.A.), held that the principl......