Eustace v. Eustace, 2017 ONSC 4814
| Judge | Barnes |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Case Date | August 09, 2017 |
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Citations | 2017 ONSC 4814 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Blake v. Blake, 2019 ONSC 5724
...seeking leave to appeal to form their intentionto appeal after the expiry of the 15 day deadline. For example, in Eustace v. Eustace, 2017 ONSC 4814 (Div. Ct.), this Court extended the time for seeking leave to appeal in circumstances where the decision was issued just before a holiday peri......
-
Edelstein v. Monteleone, 2017 ONSC 7446
...issue of jurisdiction, I did raise it at the outset of the hearing. I am satisfied on the basis of the reasoning in Eustace v. Eustace, 2017 ONSC 4814 that the Divisional Court is the appropriate jurisdiction to bring this appeal.[4] With respect to the merits of the motion for leave to app......
-
E.C. v. P.A.,
...principles applicable to a motion for leave to appeal a costs order are set out in Van v. Palombi, 2015 ONSC 170 and Eustace v. Eustace, 2017 ONSC 4814 and are as 5. Pursuant to section 133(b) of the Courts of Justice Act leave is required where an appeal relates onl......
-
Duesling v. Cormier, 2017 ONSC 5261
...the total amount of different single payment awards ordered to one party. [16] In Eustace v. Eustace, 2017 ONSC 4814, the court dealt with the question of whether a cost order is outside the jurisdiction of the Divisional Court since s. 19(1.2) of the CJA......
4 cases
-
Blake v. Blake, 2019 ONSC 5724
...seeking leave to appeal to form their intentionto appeal after the expiry of the 15 day deadline. For example, in Eustace v. Eustace, 2017 ONSC 4814 (Div. Ct.), this Court extended the time for seeking leave to appeal in circumstances where the decision was issued just before a holiday peri......
-
Edelstein v. Monteleone, 2017 ONSC 7446
...issue of jurisdiction, I did raise it at the outset of the hearing. I am satisfied on the basis of the reasoning in Eustace v. Eustace, 2017 ONSC 4814 that the Divisional Court is the appropriate jurisdiction to bring this appeal.[4] With respect to the merits of the motion for leave to app......
-
E.C. v. P.A.,
...principles applicable to a motion for leave to appeal a costs order are set out in Van v. Palombi, 2015 ONSC 170 and Eustace v. Eustace, 2017 ONSC 4814 and are as 5. Pursuant to section 133(b) of the Courts of Justice Act leave is required where an appeal relates onl......
-
Duesling v. Cormier, 2017 ONSC 5261
...the total amount of different single payment awards ordered to one party. [16] In Eustace v. Eustace, 2017 ONSC 4814, the court dealt with the question of whether a cost order is outside the jurisdiction of the Divisional Court since s. 19(1.2) of the CJA......