Ewachniuk Estate v. Ewachniuk, [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 395 (SC)
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Russell, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CONTRACTS,FAMILY LAW,LIMITATION OF ACTIONS,PRACTICE |
| Citation | [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 395 (SC),[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 395,2011 BCSC 395 |
| Date | 01 April 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Short v. Ewachniuk,
...Mr. Ewachniuk and his two sisters. [32] In the second case, Ewachniuk Estate v. Ewachniuk, 2011 BCSC 395, Justice Russell dealt with the following facts: [1] On December 23, 1980, the defendant, Alexander Theodore Ewachniuk (“Ted&......
-
Edwards v. Spektrum Glasses Ltd.,
...the language of the promissory note is clear, not ambiguous, and capable of only one meaning, relying on Ewachniuk Estate v. Ewachniuk, 2011 BCSC 395 at paras 13-14 and 17. They argue that the promissory note ought to be enforced in accordance with its clear [52] ......
2 cases
-
Short v. Ewachniuk,
...Mr. Ewachniuk and his two sisters. [32] In the second case, Ewachniuk Estate v. Ewachniuk, 2011 BCSC 395, Justice Russell dealt with the following facts: [1] On December 23, 1980, the defendant, Alexander Theodore Ewachniuk (“Ted&......
-
Edwards v. Spektrum Glasses Ltd.,
...the language of the promissory note is clear, not ambiguous, and capable of only one meaning, relying on Ewachniuk Estate v. Ewachniuk, 2011 BCSC 395 at paras 13-14 and 17. They argue that the promissory note ought to be enforced in accordance with its clear [52] ......