Farrokhmanesh v. Sahib et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1797
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Ehrcke, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE |
| Date | 15 December 2010 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Tabah v. Bress, 2018 BCSC 185
...purposes to bolster the plaintiff’s case, but none provided any additional results. The defendants rely upon Farrokhmanesh v. Sahib, 2010 BCSC 1797 where the court states at paras. 28 through 30:28 The applicant submits that the Registrar erred in disallowing the cost of the MRIs when Mr. F......
-
Smith v. Moshrefzadeh, [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1623
...Dr. Wahl's opinion and indeed he succeeded in doing so. The defendant relies on the case of Farrokhmanesh v. Sahib , 2010 BCSC 497, aff'd 2010 BCSC 1797, where the registrar disallowed the cost of a psychologist's report on the basis that it was unreasonably duplicative of the report of a p......
-
Chow v. Nguyen et al., 2012 BCSC 1432
...as charged. Discussion [15] The standard of review on a registrar's decision regarding costs is summarized in Farrokhmanesh v. Sahib, 2010 BCSC 1797 at paras. 17-18: [17] In Frost v. Frost (1940), 56 B.C.R. 30 (C.A.), the Court of Appeal discussed the proper standard on a review of a regist......
3 cases
-
Tabah v. Bress, 2018 BCSC 185
...purposes to bolster the plaintiff’s case, but none provided any additional results. The defendants rely upon Farrokhmanesh v. Sahib, 2010 BCSC 1797 where the court states at paras. 28 through 30:28 The applicant submits that the Registrar erred in disallowing the cost of the MRIs when Mr. F......
-
Smith v. Moshrefzadeh, [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1623
...Dr. Wahl's opinion and indeed he succeeded in doing so. The defendant relies on the case of Farrokhmanesh v. Sahib , 2010 BCSC 497, aff'd 2010 BCSC 1797, where the registrar disallowed the cost of a psychologist's report on the basis that it was unreasonably duplicative of the report of a p......
-
Chow v. Nguyen et al., 2012 BCSC 1432
...as charged. Discussion [15] The standard of review on a registrar's decision regarding costs is summarized in Farrokhmanesh v. Sahib, 2010 BCSC 1797 at paras. 17-18: [17] In Frost v. Frost (1940), 56 B.C.R. 30 (C.A.), the Court of Appeal discussed the proper standard on a review of a regist......