FDM v EGM, 2021 ABCA 426
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Judge | Honourable Justice Patricia Rowbotham |
| Date | 21 December 2021 |
| Citation | 2021 ABCA 426 |
| Docket Number | 2101-0175AC |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
Naubert v Trotter
...circumstances, but not always” (at para 19). 122 The same unified approach to advance costs was taken by Justice Rowbotham in FDM v EGM, 2021 ABCA 426 at para 17 (in Chambers) and Justice Kirker in JWS v CJS aka CJH, 2021 ABCA 375 at para 41 (in Chambers). And see also Blaney v Murphy, 2020......
-
MD v Alberta (Director of Child and Family Services)
...Further, as noted by the chambers judge, since the Court of Appeal is not a court of first instance (see MD at para 7, citing FDM v EGM, 2021 ABCA 426 at para 12), we are not in a position to grant the majority of the relief sought by the appellant. In denying the appellant’s request......
-
MD v Alberta (Director of Child and Family Services), 2022 ABCA 281
...not a court of first instance. It is a statutory court with a mandate to hear appeals and applications incidental to appeals: FDM v EGM, 2021 ABCA 426 at para 12. It does not make findings or grant remedies on matters never before heard by an administrative or judicial body. Thus, I cannot ......
3 cases
-
Naubert v Trotter
...circumstances, but not always” (at para 19). 122 The same unified approach to advance costs was taken by Justice Rowbotham in FDM v EGM, 2021 ABCA 426 at para 17 (in Chambers) and Justice Kirker in JWS v CJS aka CJH, 2021 ABCA 375 at para 41 (in Chambers). And see also Blaney v Murphy, 2020......
-
MD v Alberta (Director of Child and Family Services)
...Further, as noted by the chambers judge, since the Court of Appeal is not a court of first instance (see MD at para 7, citing FDM v EGM, 2021 ABCA 426 at para 12), we are not in a position to grant the majority of the relief sought by the appellant. In denying the appellant’s request......
-
MD v Alberta (Director of Child and Family Services), 2022 ABCA 281
...not a court of first instance. It is a statutory court with a mandate to hear appeals and applications incidental to appeals: FDM v EGM, 2021 ABCA 426 at para 12. It does not make findings or grant remedies on matters never before heard by an administrative or judicial body. Thus, I cannot ......