Feeney v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 71
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Patricia Rowbotham |
| Date | 22 February 2021 |
| Citation | 2021 ABCA 71 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Docket Number | 2001-0205AC 2001-0223AC |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Royal Bank of Canada v Anderson,
...leave to appeal to SCC refused, 35405 (19 September 2013), citing Morier v Rivard, [1985] 2 SCR 716, 23 DLR (4th) 1; Feeney v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 71. [51] The final two paragraphs of Ms. Anderson’s Affidavit 18) An unrebutted affidavit stands ......
-
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Hayden,
...citing Fray v Blackburn (1863), 3 B & S 576, 122 ER 217; SG v Larochelle, 2004 ABQB 123, aff’d 2005 ABCA 111; Feeney v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 71. Furthermore, the allegations against myself and Chief Justice Moreau are based on Ms. Hayden complaining that we did not respond properly ......
-
Berube v Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of Alberta,
...leave to appeal to SCC refused, 35405 (19 September 2013), citing Morier v Rivard, [1985] 2 SCR 716, 23 DLR (4th) 1; Feeney v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 71. [57] Second, Mr. Berube has sued several Crown Prosecutors, and certain of his allegations relate to......
-
Richardson v MacDonald,
...leave to appeal to SCC refused, 35405 (19 September 2013), citing Morier v Rivard, [1985] 2 SCR 716, 23 DLR (4th) 1; Feeney v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 71. Judges are not appropriate parties to challenges of their decisions: Hok v Alberta (Court of Queen’s Bench), 2021 ABCA 321 at para [35]......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Royal Bank of Canada v Anderson,
...leave to appeal to SCC refused, 35405 (19 September 2013), citing Morier v Rivard, [1985] 2 SCR 716, 23 DLR (4th) 1; Feeney v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 71. [51] The final two paragraphs of Ms. Anderson’s Affidavit 18) An unrebutted affidavit stands ......
-
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Hayden,
...citing Fray v Blackburn (1863), 3 B & S 576, 122 ER 217; SG v Larochelle, 2004 ABQB 123, aff’d 2005 ABCA 111; Feeney v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 71. Furthermore, the allegations against myself and Chief Justice Moreau are based on Ms. Hayden complaining that we did not respond properly ......
-
Berube v Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of Alberta,
...leave to appeal to SCC refused, 35405 (19 September 2013), citing Morier v Rivard, [1985] 2 SCR 716, 23 DLR (4th) 1; Feeney v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 71. [57] Second, Mr. Berube has sued several Crown Prosecutors, and certain of his allegations relate to......
-
Richardson v MacDonald,
...leave to appeal to SCC refused, 35405 (19 September 2013), citing Morier v Rivard, [1985] 2 SCR 716, 23 DLR (4th) 1; Feeney v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 71. Judges are not appropriate parties to challenges of their decisions: Hok v Alberta (Court of Queen’s Bench), 2021 ABCA 321 at para [35]......
Request a trial to view additional results