Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641
| Judge | J.D. Rooke |
| Date | 22 October 2020 |
| Citation | 2020 ABQB 641 |
| Docket Number | 1701 13254, 1801 06777 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
20 practice notes
-
JACKSON v. JACKSON,
...These principles were summarized and explained in a complete manner by Rooke A.C.J. in Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641: [15] A simple allegation of bias or misconduct is not a basis for judges to remove themselves from a matter: Bizon v Bizon, 2014 ABCA 174 at paras 61......
-
Feeney v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 398
...in that Court of an Originating Application for ‘Judicial Review’ of an earlier decision by him dated October 22, 2020 at 2020 ABQB 641 dealing with QB13254 and QB06777. The applicant had already filed a Notice of Appeal from the October 22, 2020 decision on Court File No 2001......
-
Alston v Haywood Securities Inc, 2022 ABKB 797
...30 at paras 47-48; Rana v Rana, 2022 ABQB 141 at para 7; Feeney v TD General Insurance Company, 2021 ABQB 947 at para 23; Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641 at paras 12-13, aff’d 2022 ABCA [16] I directed that if Ms Alston wished......
-
Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Co, 2021 ABQB 440
...that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or unconsciously, would not decide fairly... [citation omitted]" In Feeney v Simon, 2020 ABQB 641, Rooke ACJ succinctly summarized the legal principles with respect to bias at paras 15 to 21, the key aspects of which are as A simple allega......
Get Started for Free
20 cases
-
JACKSON v. JACKSON
...These principles were summarized and explained in a complete manner by Rooke A.C.J. in Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641: [15] A simple allegation of bias or misconduct is not a basis for judges to remove themselves from a matter: Bizon v Bizon, 2014 ABCA 174 at paras 61......
-
Feeney v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 398
...in that Court of an Originating Application for ‘Judicial Review’ of an earlier decision by him dated October 22, 2020 at 2020 ABQB 641 dealing with QB13254 and QB06777. The applicant had already filed a Notice of Appeal from the October 22, 2020 decision on Court File No 2001......
-
Alston v Haywood Securities Inc, 2022 ABKB 797
...30 at paras 47-48; Rana v Rana, 2022 ABQB 141 at para 7; Feeney v TD General Insurance Company, 2021 ABQB 947 at para 23; Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641 at paras 12-13, aff’d 2022 ABCA [16] I directed that if Ms Alston wished......
-
Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Co, 2021 ABQB 440
...that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or unconsciously, would not decide fairly... [citation omitted]" In Feeney v Simon, 2020 ABQB 641, Rooke ACJ succinctly summarized the legal principles with respect to bias at paras 15 to 21, the key aspects of which are as A simple allega......
Get Started for Free