Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641
| Judge | J.D. Rooke |
| Date | 22 October 2020 |
| Citation | 2020 ABQB 641 |
| Docket Number | 1701 13254, 1801 06777 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
19 practice notes
-
JACKSON v. JACKSON, 2022 SKQB 114
...These principles were summarized and explained in a complete manner by Rooke A.C.J. in Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641: [15] A simple allegation of bias or misconduct is not a basis for judges to remove themselves from a matter: Bizon v Bizon, 2014 ABCA 174 at paras 61......
-
AR v JU, 2021 ABQB 127
...Nation v. McMullen, 2020 ABQB 87, primarily at paras 12-25, appeal denied 2020 ABCA 366, primarily at paras 51-63; and Simon v. Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641, at paras 15-33 (appeal pending). See also Point on the Bow Development Ltd. v. William Kelly & Sons Plumbing Contractors Ltd., 2005 ABQB......
-
Feeney v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 398
...in that Court of an Originating Application for ‘Judicial Review’ of an earlier decision by him dated October 22, 2020 at 2020 ABQB 641 dealing with QB13254 and QB06777. The applicant had already filed a Notice of Appeal from the October 22, 2020 decision on Court File No 2001......
-
Alston v Haywood Securities Inc, 2022 ABKB 797
...30 at paras 47-48; Rana v Rana, 2022 ABQB 141 at para 7; Feeney v TD General Insurance Company, 2021 ABQB 947 at para 23; Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641 at paras 12-13, aff’d 2022 ABCA [16] I directed that if Ms Alston wished......
Get Started for Free
19 cases
-
JACKSON v. JACKSON, 2022 SKQB 114
...These principles were summarized and explained in a complete manner by Rooke A.C.J. in Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641: [15] A simple allegation of bias or misconduct is not a basis for judges to remove themselves from a matter: Bizon v Bizon, 2014 ABCA 174 at paras 61......
-
AR v JU, 2021 ABQB 127
...Nation v. McMullen, 2020 ABQB 87, primarily at paras 12-25, appeal denied 2020 ABCA 366, primarily at paras 51-63; and Simon v. Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641, at paras 15-33 (appeal pending). See also Point on the Bow Development Ltd. v. William Kelly & Sons Plumbing Contractors Ltd., 2005 ABQB......
-
Feeney v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 398
...in that Court of an Originating Application for ‘Judicial Review’ of an earlier decision by him dated October 22, 2020 at 2020 ABQB 641 dealing with QB13254 and QB06777. The applicant had already filed a Notice of Appeal from the October 22, 2020 decision on Court File No 2001......
-
Alston v Haywood Securities Inc, 2022 ABKB 797
...30 at paras 47-48; Rana v Rana, 2022 ABQB 141 at para 7; Feeney v TD General Insurance Company, 2021 ABQB 947 at para 23; Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641 at paras 12-13, aff’d 2022 ABCA [16] I directed that if Ms Alston wished......
Get Started for Free