Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641
| Judge | J.D. Rooke |
| Date | 22 October 2020 |
| Citation | 2020 ABQB 641 |
| Docket Number | 1701 13254, 1801 06777 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 practice notes
-
JACKSON v. JACKSON,
...These principles were summarized and explained in a complete manner by Rooke A.C.J. in Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641: [15] A simple allegation of bias or misconduct is not a basis for judges to remove themselves from a matter: Bizon v Bizon, 2014 ABCA 174 at paras 61......
-
AR v JU, 2021 ABQB 127
...Nation v. McMullen, 2020 ABQB 87, primarily at paras 12-25, appeal denied 2020 ABCA 366, primarily at paras 51-63; and Simon v. Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641, at paras 15-33 (appeal pending). See also Point on the Bow Development Ltd. v. William Kelly & Sons Plumbing Contractors Ltd., 2005 ABQB......
-
Tican v Alamgir,
...and lawyers had tampered with Mr. Feeney's motor vehicle brakes, with the intention of killing Mr. Feeney: Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641 at para 89. An even more dramatic example is that vexatious litigant Dale Richardson claimed Associate Chief Justice Rooke is part of a Masonic consp......
-
Feeney v Alberta,
...in that Court of an Originating Application for ‘Judicial Review’ of an earlier decision by him dated October 22, 2020 at 2020 ABQB 641 dealing with QB13254 and QB06777. The applicant had already filed a Notice of Appeal from the October 22, 2020 decision on Court File No 2001......
Request a trial to view additional results
20 cases
-
JACKSON v. JACKSON,
...These principles were summarized and explained in a complete manner by Rooke A.C.J. in Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641: [15] A simple allegation of bias or misconduct is not a basis for judges to remove themselves from a matter: Bizon v Bizon, 2014 ABCA 174 at paras 61......
-
AR v JU, 2021 ABQB 127
...Nation v. McMullen, 2020 ABQB 87, primarily at paras 12-25, appeal denied 2020 ABCA 366, primarily at paras 51-63; and Simon v. Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641, at paras 15-33 (appeal pending). See also Point on the Bow Development Ltd. v. William Kelly & Sons Plumbing Contractors Ltd., 2005 ABQB......
-
Tican v Alamgir,
...and lawyers had tampered with Mr. Feeney's motor vehicle brakes, with the intention of killing Mr. Feeney: Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641 at para 89. An even more dramatic example is that vexatious litigant Dale Richardson claimed Associate Chief Justice Rooke is part of a Masonic consp......
-
Feeney v Alberta,
...in that Court of an Originating Application for ‘Judicial Review’ of an earlier decision by him dated October 22, 2020 at 2020 ABQB 641 dealing with QB13254 and QB06777. The applicant had already filed a Notice of Appeal from the October 22, 2020 decision on Court File No 2001......
Request a trial to view additional results