Ferguson v. Ferguson, 2019 BCSC 1946
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice Branch |
| Citation | 2019 BCSC 1946 |
| Date | 13 November 2019 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | E160037 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Y.L. v. G.L., 2020 BCSC 808
...is evidence of the Bank of Canada Prime Business Rate or no evidence of the Bank of Canada Prime Business Rate: Ferguson v. Ferguson, 2019 BCSC 1946 at para. 23; and J.R. v. N.R., 2017 BCSC 455 at para. 98. In Devathasan v. Devathasan, 2019 BCSC 661 at paras. 291-294, the court made no refe......
-
Zhao v. Zhou, 2020 BCSC 516
...he is capable of making, he is not entitled to visit the financial implications of such a choice on his children: Ferguson v. Ferguson, 2019 BCSC 1946 at paras. 26-31; Hathaway v. Hathaway, 2015 BCSC 1485 at para 59. The respondent sought to explain his choice on the basis that he wished to......
-
Severson v Gault,
...to pursue a new business, only that he can no longer visit the implications of this decision on his children: Ferguson v. Ferguson, 2019 BCSC 1946, at para 31. [para 14] [emphasis [52] And Hawco v Myers, 2005 NLCA 74 (per Rowe JA, as he then wa......
-
Nair v. Nair, 2020 BCSC 677
...to pursue a new business, only that he can no longer visit the implications of this decision on his children: Ferguson v. Ferguson, 2019 BCSC 1946, at para. [15] I conclude that it is reasonable to impute further income to Mr. Nair on the basis that he should be able to devote 20 hours per ......
4 cases
-
Y.L. v. G.L., 2020 BCSC 808
...is evidence of the Bank of Canada Prime Business Rate or no evidence of the Bank of Canada Prime Business Rate: Ferguson v. Ferguson, 2019 BCSC 1946 at para. 23; and J.R. v. N.R., 2017 BCSC 455 at para. 98. In Devathasan v. Devathasan, 2019 BCSC 661 at paras. 291-294, the court made no refe......
-
Zhao v. Zhou, 2020 BCSC 516
...he is capable of making, he is not entitled to visit the financial implications of such a choice on his children: Ferguson v. Ferguson, 2019 BCSC 1946 at paras. 26-31; Hathaway v. Hathaway, 2015 BCSC 1485 at para 59. The respondent sought to explain his choice on the basis that he wished to......
-
Severson v Gault,
...to pursue a new business, only that he can no longer visit the implications of this decision on his children: Ferguson v. Ferguson, 2019 BCSC 1946, at para 31. [para 14] [emphasis [52] And Hawco v Myers, 2005 NLCA 74 (per Rowe JA, as he then wa......
-
Nair v. Nair, 2020 BCSC 677
...to pursue a new business, only that he can no longer visit the implications of this decision on his children: Ferguson v. Ferguson, 2019 BCSC 1946, at para. [15] I conclude that it is reasonable to impute further income to Mr. Nair on the basis that he should be able to devote 20 hours per ......