Findlay v. Holmes, (1998) 111 O.A.C. 319 (CA)
Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
Case Date | February 25, 1998 |
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Citations | (1998), 111 O.A.C. 319 (CA) |
Findlay v. Holmes (1998), 111 O.A.C. 319 (CA)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [1998] O.A.C. TBEd. JL.025
Russell Findlay, Maurice Findlay and Eva Findlay (plaintiffs/appellants) v. Dr. Frank R. Holmes (defendant/respondent)
(C21681)
Indexed As: Findlay v. Holmes
Ontario Court of Appeal
McKinlay and Austin, JJ.A., and Dunnet, J.(ad hoc)
July 3, 1998.
Summary:
Findlay suffered from chronic progressive multiple sclerosis and was treated off and on from 1978 to 1986 with prednisone. In 1989, Findlay sued his family doctor for medical malpractice, alleging that he suffered from steroid-induced osteoporosis.
The Ontario Court (General Division) dismissed the action, holding that it was statute-barred by s. 17 of the Health Disciplines Act. Findlay appealed.
The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.
Damage Awards - Topic 360
Injury and death - Disease or illness - Caused by drug reaction - Findlay suffered from chronic progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) and was treated off and on from 1978 to 1986 with prednisone - Findlay sued his family doctor for medical malpractice, alleging that he suffered from steroid-induced osteoporosis - The trial judge dismissed the action but provisionally assessed general damages of $100,000 - The Ontario Court of Appeal affirmed the decision - See paragraphs 21 to 24.
Damage Awards - Topic 634
Torts - Injury to the person - Medical or dental malpractice - [See Damage Awards - Topic 360 ].
Medicine - Topic 3052
Relation with patient - Consent to treatment - Standard of disclosure by doctor - Findlay suffered from chronic progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) and was treated off and on from 1978 to 1986 with prednisone - Findlay sued his family doctor for medical malpractice, alleging that he suffered from steroid-induced osteoporosis - The Ontario Court of Appeal affirmed that the doctor did not fail in his duty to disclose the risks associated with prednisone, and in any event, a reasonable patient in the plaintiff's circumstances would have taken the prednisone after a full warning of the possible side effects - See paragraphs 18 to 20.
Medicine - Topic 4242
Liability of practitioners - Negligence - Standard of care - Findlay suffered from chronic progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) and was treated off and on from 1978 to 1986 with prednisone - Findlay sued his family doctor for medical malpractice, alleging that he suffered from steroid-induced osteoporosis - The Ontario Court of Appeal affirmed that the doctor met an acceptable standard of care in the circumstances - The court noted that prednisone was the most commonly used medication for treatment of MS at the time - The doctor's use of referrals which were followed by telephone calls and letters to consultants at the MS Clinic went beyond the standard one would have expected of a general practitioner at the time - See paragraphs 16, 17.
Medicine - Topic 4244.2
Liability of practitioners - Negligence - Treatment with or withdrawal from drugs with side effects (incl. steroids) - [See Medicine - Topic 4242 ].
Medicine - Topic 4324
Liability of practitioners - Bars to actions - Limitation periods - Findlay suffered from chronic progressive multiple sclerosis and was treated off and on from 1978 to 1986 with prednisone - Findlay sued his family doctor for medical malpractice, alleging that he suffered from steroid-induced osteoporosis - The action was commenced on February 22, 1989 - The trial judge dismissed the action, because the action was statute-barred by the one year limitation period in s. 17 of the Health Disciplines Act - The trial judge held that the plaintiff had actual or deemed knowledge of the steroid induced osteoporosis by March 1987 - The Ontario Court of Appeal affirmed the decision - See paragraphs 25 to 36.
Cases Noticed:
Crits v. Sylvester (1956), 1 D.L.R.(2d) 502 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 17].
Clemens v. Brown (1958), 13 D.L.R.(2d) 488 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 25].
Peixeiro v. Haberman (1997), 217 N.R. 371; 103 O.A.C. 161; 151 D.L.R.(4th) 429 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 28].
Gaudet et al. v. Levy et al. (1984), 47 O.R.(2d) 577 (H.C.), refd to. [para. 29].
Law v. Kingston General Hospital et al. (1983), 42 O.R.(2d) 476 (H.C.), refd to. [para. 29].
Statutes Noticed:
Health Disciplines Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. H-4, sect. 17 [para. 26].
Counsel:
Kirk F. Stevens and Mary L. Macaulay, for the appellants;
Elizabeth M. Stewart, for the respondent.
This appeal was heard on February 25, 1998, before McKinlay and Austin, JJ.A., and Dunnet, J.(ad hoc), of the Ontario Court of Appeal. The following decision of the court was released by Dunnet, J.(ad hoc), on July 3, 1998.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 24, 2023 ' April 28, 2023)
...Act, R.S.O.1990, c. L.15, s. 23(1),Rules of Civil Procedure, r.20.04(2.1),Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7,Findlay v. Holmes, (1998), 111 O.A.C. 319 (C.A.),Noddle v. The Ontario Ministry of Health, 2019ONSC7337,Soper v. Southcott(1998), 39 O.R. (3d) 737 (C.A.) Short Civil Decisions Fockler v.......
-
K.G. et al. v. Wong et al., 2008 ABQB 638
...Professional Corp. v. Bank of Nova Scotia (2007), 404 A.R. 303; 394 W.A.C. 303; 2007 ABCA 10, refd to. [para. 71]. Findlay v. Holmes (1998), 111 O.A.C. 319; 80 A.C.W.S.(3d) 1109 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 73]. Gaudet et al. v. Levy et al. (1984), 47 O.R.(2d) 577; 11 D.L.R.(4th) 721 (H.C.), ref......
-
Rhine v. Millan et al., (2000) 263 A.R. 201 (QB)
...B.C.J. No. 1236, refd to. [para. 142]. McCamley v. Kepkay (1999), 9 B.C.T.C. 241 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 143]. Findlay v. Holmes (1998), 111 O.A.C. 319 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Authors and Works Noticed: Bockus Gastroenterology (4th Ed. 1985), pp. 2314, 2315 [para. 121]. Carter, Rose, Canadi......
-
Oliver v. Severance et al., (2005) 245 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 332 (PEITD)
...Ct.), refd to. [para. 69]. Martin v. Lyver, [1997] O.J. No. 970; 24 O.T.C. 110 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 69]. Findlay v. Holmes (1998), 111 O.A.C. 319 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Gallant v. Workers' Compensation Board (P.E.I.) et al. (2002), 218 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 297; 653 A.P.R. 297 (......
-
K.G. et al. v. Wong et al., 2008 ABQB 638
...Professional Corp. v. Bank of Nova Scotia (2007), 404 A.R. 303; 394 W.A.C. 303; 2007 ABCA 10, refd to. [para. 71]. Findlay v. Holmes (1998), 111 O.A.C. 319; 80 A.C.W.S.(3d) 1109 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 73]. Gaudet et al. v. Levy et al. (1984), 47 O.R.(2d) 577; 11 D.L.R.(4th) 721 (H.C.), ref......
-
Rhine v. Millan et al., (2000) 263 A.R. 201 (QB)
...B.C.J. No. 1236, refd to. [para. 142]. McCamley v. Kepkay (1999), 9 B.C.T.C. 241 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 143]. Findlay v. Holmes (1998), 111 O.A.C. 319 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Authors and Works Noticed: Bockus Gastroenterology (4th Ed. 1985), pp. 2314, 2315 [para. 121]. Carter, Rose, Canadi......
-
Ford Motor Co. of Canada Ltd. v. Municipal Employees Retirement Board (Ont.) et al., [2004] O.T.C. 53 (SC)
...4172 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 267]. Thomson v. Clanmorris (Lord), [1900] 1 Ch. 718 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 270]. Findlay v. Holmes (1998), 111 O.A.C. 319 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 272]. Central Trust Co. v. Rafuse and Cordon, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 147; 69 N.R. 321; 75 N.S.R.(2d) 109; 186 A.P.R. ......
-
Oliver v. Severance et al.,
...Ct.), refd to. [para. 69]. Martin v. Lyver, [1997] O.J. No. 970; 24 O.T.C. 110 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 69]. Findlay v. Holmes (1998), 111 O.A.C. 319 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Gallant v. Workers' Compensation Board (P.E.I.) et al. (2002), 218 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 297; 653 A.P.R. 297 (......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 24, 2023 ' April 28, 2023)
...Act, R.S.O.1990, c. L.15, s. 23(1),Rules of Civil Procedure, r.20.04(2.1),Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7,Findlay v. Holmes, (1998), 111 O.A.C. 319 (C.A.),Noddle v. The Ontario Ministry of Health, 2019ONSC7337,Soper v. Southcott(1998), 39 O.R. (3d) 737 (C.A.) Short Civil Decisions Fockler v.......